Subject: bug#65997: 29.1; ?\N{char_name} reference is wrong, Re: bug#65997: 29.1; ?\N{char_name} reference is wrong

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 14:24:48 +0300

> From: Robert Pluim <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>,  [email-masked],
>   [email-masked]
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:57:11 +0200
> 
>     awrhygty> 16FE4	KHITAN SMALL SCRIPT FILLER	0	error
>     awrhygty> 16FF0	VIETNAMESE ALTERNATE READING MARK CA	0	error
>     awrhygty> 16FF1	VIETNAMESE ALTERNATE READING MARK NHAY	0	error
>     awrhygty> 1B132	HIRAGANA LETTER SMALL KO	0	error
>     >> 
>     >> And similarly for these 4.
> 
>     Eli> These 4 should probably be included.  They were excluded because they
>     Eli> are in the ranges that were once unused.
> 
> OK. Iʼll put a comment in admin/notes/unicode on master for the future.

I already did that (since I had to do this just the other day ;-).