GNU bug report logs - #65928
[PATCH] Introduce 'project-save-buffers'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: me <at> elken.dev

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 21:28:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch, wontfix

Done: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65928: closed ([PATCH] Introduce 'project-save-buffers')
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:56:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:55:42 +0200
with message-id <a926b48f-ffab-49e4-acf2-ed9fae9ec92a <at> gutov.dev>
and subject line Re: bug#65928: [PATCH] Introduce 'project-save-buffers'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #65928,
regarding [PATCH] Introduce 'project-save-buffers'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
65928: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65928
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: me <at> elken.dev
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Introduce 'project-save-buffers'
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 22:26:39 +0100
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi all,

A small patch to introduce a function from projectile that I feel is 
missing, please feel free to yell at me if this has already been 
rejected :)

Thanks all,

Ellis (@lkn)
[0001-Introduce-project-save-buffers.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 65928-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, me <at> elken.dev, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Subject: Re: bug#65928: [PATCH] Introduce 'project-save-buffers'
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:55:42 +0200
On 12/02/2025 06:22, Stefan Kangas wrote:
> Dmitry Gutov<dmitry <at> gutov.dev> writes:
> 
>> On 15/09/2023 09:32, Juri Linkov wrote:
>>>> Would something like
>>>>       (defalias 'project-save-buffers #'save-some-buffers-root)
>>>> do the job?
>>> Rather something more like this will do the job:
>>> ```
>>> (keymap-set project-prefix-map "S"
>>>               (lambda (&optional arg)
>>>                 (interactive "P")
>>>                 (let ((save-some-buffers-default-predicate 'save-some-buffers-root))
>>>                   (save-some-buffers arg))))
>>> ```
>> Would you say that the added capability to only save certain buffers but not
>> others, is something you found useful in practice?
>>
>> More than once a year or so.
> Maybe we should just close this as a wontfix?

Let's!

Please reopen if somebody disagrees.


This bug report was last modified 157 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.