GNU bug report logs - #65908
29.1.50; Emacs 29 regresses on macOS

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Zhang Haijun <ccsmile2008 <at> outlook.com>

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 06:48:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.1.50

Fixed in version 29.2

Done: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>
Cc: gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com, gregory <at> heytings.org, 65908 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas <at> gmail.com, ccsmile2008 <at> outlook.com
Subject: bug#65908: 29.1.50; Emacs 29 regresses on macOS
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 20:02:41 +0300
> Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 17:33:56 +0100
> From: Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>
> Cc: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>,
> 	ccsmile2008 <at> outlook.com, 65908 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> 	gregory <at> heytings.org, stefankangas <at> gmail.com
> 
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:11:01PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  gregory <at> heytings.org,
> > >   65908 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  stefankangas <at> gmail.com,  ccsmile2008 <at> outlook.com
> > > Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 15:18:42 +0200
> > > 
> > > I'd like to propose the attached patch for problem of invalid LANG
> > > setting.  This simply falls back to "en_US.UTF-8" if LANG isn't valid,
> > > or something valid can't be deduced from the locale.
> > 
> > Why is it reasonable to force the UTF-8 codeset as the fallback?
> 
> Both the macOS terminals I have access to use UTF-8 as their default,
> and I'm not sure if they even let you change it. Therefore it seemed
> reasonable to me that the default for Emacs should also be UTF-8.

Are you saying that macOS doesn't support non-UTF-8 encodings?

> > What about having a variable exposed to Lisp that allows the users to
> > control the fallback value of LANG?
> 
> Is this not too early in startup for that? If not then couldn't the
> user just use setenv and avoid this whole thing?

Maybe that's fine, I just asked a question.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 226 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.