GNU bug report logs - #65884
29.1; prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point documentation

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Peter Mao <peter.mao <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:21:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.1

Fixed in version 29.2

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: peter.mao <at> gmail.com, 65884 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65884: 29.1; prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point documentation
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:46:57 +0300
> Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
> Cc: 65884-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 13:45:47 -0700
> 
> Version: 29.2
> 
> Peter Mao <peter.mao <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > I just learned about prettify-symbols mode and prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point from Tony Zorman's recent blog post, so I tried it out, unsuccessfully
> > at first...
> >
> > Recipe from emacs -Q:
> >
> > In the *scratch* buffer:
> > M-x prettify-symbols-mode
> > (setq prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point t)
> > C-x C-e ;; to evaluate the setq
> > lambda  ;; the symbol λ appears
> > C-b
> >
> > At this point, I'm expecting the symbol λ to deprettify back to
> > "lambda", but it does not.
> >
> > Looking in the code in prog-mode.el, I see that the unprettification
> > needs to be set **before** the minor mode is activated in the buffer.
> > Perhaps this should be pointed out in the documentation?
> 
> Thanks, I've now documented this on emacs-29.

Did you forget to push?




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 255 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.