GNU bug report logs - #65866
[PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:25:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, GNU Guix maintainers <guix-maintainers <at> gnu.org>, Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, 65866-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Baines <guix <at> cbaines.net>
Subject: [bug#65866] Toward RFC? (was Re: [bug#65866] [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts)
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 16:12:02 +0100
Hi Simon and all,

This is again a long message but I’ll try to reply shortly.

First, my apologies as I failed to understand that you were rejecting
the change altogether—I interpreted your comments on details about the
patches as a sign that you were not opposing the idea in itself.

Second, the sentence of mine you quoted was poorly worded.  I felt with
your last messages in the thread that you were questioning
“builtin:download” itself, which was going way beyond the scope of this
patch.

Last, and probably more importantly: I’m all for an RFC process as you
propose!  I think this is something we desperately need anytime we make
non-trivial changes to the core, to command-line interfaces, etc.  I’ll
be there to support a move in that direction as much as I can.

So… thank you for making pushing this proposal.

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 202 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.