GNU bug report logs - #65866
[PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, 65866 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Baines <guix <at> cbaines.net>
Subject: [bug#65866] [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:49:44 -0400

Hi,

Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Re,
>
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 at 11:23, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>>>> +  "Return a fixed-output derivation without any dependency that performs a Git
>>>> +checkout of REF, using the \"builtin:git-download\" derivation builder."
>>>
>>> I do not understand what means “without any dependency” here.
>>
>> It means the derivation does not depend on anything (it has zero
>> “sources” and zero “input derivations”).  That’s fundamental here, which
>> is why I made it explicit.
>
> For instance, in ’built-in-download’, the docstring reads:
>
> This is an \"out-of-band\" download in that the returned derivation does not
> explicitly depend on Guile, GnuTLS, etc.  Instead, the daemon performs the
> download by itself using its own dependencies.
>
> which I find “clearer” than “without any dependency”.
>
> Well, enough for nitpicking. :-)

I also think the built-in-download's docstring explicitness is nicer.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.