GNU bug report logs - #65788
poor information when updating using “guix time-machine”

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 65788 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#65788: poor information when updating using “guix time-machine”
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:55:54 -0400

Hi,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

[...]

> PS: We should define rules for “Reviewed-by” tags because I don’t think
>     I LGTM’d commit 79ec651a286c71a3d4c72be33a1f80e76a560031 (?).

It was a friendly credit added based on substantial comments I received
and acted upon from your review,
e.g. https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64746#7.

I don't mind if we codify to add these only when the reviewer added
their 'LGTM' approval stamp; there's an ongoing change adding some
guidelines for reviews in bug#66436, we should add this bit in.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.