Subject: bug#65764: closed (Re: bug#65764: Fix typo in backward-word-strictly)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 19:52:03 +0000

Your bug report

#65764: Fix typo in backward-word-strictly

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
65764: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65764
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#65764: Fix typo in backward-word-strictly
From: Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]>
To: Joseph Turner <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:50:57 -0700
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

Version: 29.2

Joseph Turner via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of
text editors" <[email-masked]> writes:

> From 577be585960191bd1de077aaf451f5b08895a836 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Joseph Turner <[email-masked]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:05:58 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo
>
> * lisp/subr.el (backward-word-strictly):

Thanks, installed on emacs-29.

Subject: Fix typo in backward-word-strictly
From: Joseph Turner <[email-masked]>
To: Emacs Bugs Mailing List <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 12:35:55 -0700
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

>From 577be585960191bd1de077aaf451f5b08895a836 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Turner <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:05:58 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo

* lisp/subr.el (backward-word-strictly):
---
 lisp/subr.el | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lisp/subr.el b/lisp/subr.el
index 34d87e83310..6cedaffa806 100644
--- a/lisp/subr.el
+++ b/lisp/subr.el
@@ -6039,7 +6039,7 @@ by `find-word-boundary-function-table'.  It is also not interactive."
 With argument ARG, do this that many times.
 If ARG is omitted or nil, move point backward one word.
 
-This function is like `forward-word', but it is not affected
+This function is like `backward-word', but it is not affected
 by `find-word-boundary-function-table'.  It is also not interactive."
   (let ((find-word-boundary-function-table
          (if (char-table-p word-move-empty-char-table)
-- 
2.41.0