From unknown Sun Aug 10 09:46:08 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#65761 <65761@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#65761 <65761@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: OpenBLAS ILP64 using `-ilp64` lib name suffix instead of the standard `64_` Reply-To: bug#65761 <65761@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 16:46:08 +0000 retitle 65761 OpenBLAS ILP64 using `-ilp64` lib name suffix instead of the = standard `64_` reassign 65761 guix submitter 65761 Maya Tomasek severity 65761 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 05 11:55:57 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2023 15:55:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57984 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdYPF-0001tN-Bw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 11:55:57 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:58586) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdYPC-0001t8-P2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 11:55:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qdYP6-0005DG-K3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 11:55:48 -0400 Received: from layka.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qdYP3-0000et-PR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 11:55:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723D5414C2 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 17:55:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m7uDDonCy6Fk for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 17:55:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Maya Tomasek DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1693929341; bh=LXv2txqaTP7jtyEEDXwK5BZYI4d+68V1Q68Nxiq2xZE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=PS9z6N3TIMe/ipopfK/9u4TTsef2NaKlCen67O+8vD6LwYWZEMoameRFSnRpY94M7 KOgzgkbE6U0k4kTkztUd2dCYhgV8cM+BOUsFxPHRW1QUcvjcRILMkl+0qjzHGlLRcV 4rJpdnXcgFcjGnldzfigSZXa0fleV9NAtbDE+rtB/GmUNAffd2sWZTuD3s+XffNLAN XiOcYJE9F/LZBD2GkRrRP1fkwyJoJ56rRvHscZ8DPaT2iapYy/kWY8DDfvOq+rLuiU 0gRig6H1Ab3FF5U9L4vZ7p6PhwAEtXO0Mdk/qzzZo1B1plnNS3Ft3bM00jrIC2vsWk 2T9rrADRw5LZw== To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: OpenBLAS ILP64 using `-ilp64` lib name suffix instead of the standard `64_` Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 17:55:35 +0200 Message-ID: <878r9kpqbs.fsf@disroot.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=maya.tomasek@disroot.org; helo=layka.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) The problem is as per official OpenBLAS docs (https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/blob/c3f2a3c0ca8d4a3700f81f176dd3f1bc08cff3dd/docs/distributing.md?plain=1#L79) that some applications expect a `libopenblas64_.so` name, but Guix chooses it's custom `-ilp64`. This messes up with Julia for example. If the suffix `-ilp64` is needed, there also needs to be a `64_` suffix. Otherwise some apps inexplicably fail on a wrongly named file. Maya From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 28 06:04:05 2023 Received: (at 65761-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2023 10:04:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwgAn-00063Q-0V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 06:04:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43472) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwgAk-00062v-DE for 65761-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 06:04:04 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwgA9-0006n5-2n; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 06:03:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=0DryysBlDdAQcK0xHZQu66qNqz5dCinerimucUSZduU=; b=IjOxbXrZI+AunESaQIWY dB1rTX/ffc0afiVvTWzZGyhK0Y3rKgUUf4GwiidD8zp/FgomaBRN31a+97PDdq7nIKUV2+XGtlMge s37m1A2fja8VfvZcCQAAObtAxq6WAVHTK1VLzbNVGq5cvBubrIdiqH3X5jYzAQ1DLO5nee7nYwumj PYIdvVtAydq6VjZ248A9i5jUf7T9fJ+q1hOrLE/ACB3cBibB44S3QSA9csJaQKD0K/4wL8MZUSIPB DQmD0I1rCg0krrvFeW85q7IfhO4EIYqJhKkugQWgKeKNTUIH5RcYBgOcf+r6WvIbDXLazfQ+akaGW dGRZzSYXEUkZ5g==; From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Maya Tomasek Subject: Re: bug#65761: OpenBLAS ILP64 using `-ilp64` lib name suffix instead of the standard `64_` In-Reply-To: <878r9kpqbs.fsf@disroot.org> (Maya Tomasek's message of "Tue, 05 Sep 2023 17:55:35 +0200") References: <878r9kpqbs.fsf@disroot.org> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 12:03:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87wmv783o5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65761-done Cc: 65761-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Maya, Maya Tomasek skribis: > The problem is as per official OpenBLAS docs > (https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/blob/c3f2a3c0ca8d4a3700f81f176dd3f1bc= 08cff3dd/docs/distributing.md?plain=3D1#L79) > that some applications expect a `libopenblas64_.so` name, but Guix > chooses it's custom `-ilp64`. This messes up with Julia for example. If > the suffix `-ilp64` is needed, there also needs to be a `64_` > suffix. Otherwise some apps inexplicably fail on a wrongly named file. If I=E2=80=99m not mistaken, this was fixed by a473d562ffdd745285fa6c82ba9a8d7e421e8bca (precisely while addressing an issue with Julia). I=E2=80=99m closing the issue but please reopen if I got it wrong! Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Aug 10 09:46:08 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 12:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator