GNU bug report logs - #6576
documentation `string-to-char' is incorrect

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: MON KEY <monkey <at> sandpframing.com>

Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 21:35:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #32 received at 6576 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: monkey <at> sandpframing.com, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org, 6576 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#6576: documentation `string-to-char' is incorrect
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 06:06:56 +0300
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> Cc: schwab <at> linux-m68k.org,  monkey <at> sandpframing.com,  6576 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:50:59 +0200
> 
> >   "Return the codepoint of the first character of STRING.
> >
> >   Value is the Unicode codepoint, if it is below #x110000 (in hex).
> >   Codepoints beyond that are Emacs extensions of Unicode.  In
> >   particular, eight-bit characters are returned as codepoints in
> >   the range #x3FFF80 through #x3FFFFF, inclusive."
> 
> I've now installed a slight variation on this in Emacs 24.
> 
> But after checking it in, I started wondering whether this doc string
> really makes sense.  The function returns an Emacs character, and it
> would be rather weird if all functions that take or return an Emacs
> character goes through that entire explanation.

Which other functions would need this?

> Is there a specific reason this particular function deserves this
> detailed explanation?

If you can suggest a better one that takes care of the original bug
report, please show your suggestion.




This bug report was last modified 14 years and 2 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.