GNU bug report logs - #65713
compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65713: closed (compilation-next-error says: Moved past last
 error, even when none)
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 08:03:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2023 11:02:41 +0300
with message-id <83cyxt4hum.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #65713,
regarding compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
65713: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65713
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 03:19:30 -0500

compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error
even if there was no errors that it found.
So it should differentiate such cases.
M-x compile

make
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.

OK, there was no error, so instead of "Moved past last error" it should
say "Didn't find any errors" when asked.
emacs-version "29.1"

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis <at> me.com>
Cc: 65713-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Subject: Re: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error,
 even when none
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 11:02:41 +0300

> From: Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis <at> me.com>
> Cc: jidanni <at> jidanni.org, 65713 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 22:18:06 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> Is it really correct to say that the point
> >> "moved" when it did not move?
> >
> > Would it help to remove the "Moved" part?
> 
> That sounds like a good idea.

Done on master, and closing the bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.