GNU bug report logs - #65713
compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>

Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 08:20:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 65713 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 65713 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Subject: Re: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error,
 even when none
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 12:07:36 +0300
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 02:00:50 -0700
> Cc: 65713 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> OK, there was no error, so instead of "Moved past last error" it should
> >> say "Didn't find any errors" when asked.
> >
> > FWIW, I don't see any need for such a feature.  "Moved past the last
> > error" is correct even if there are no errors, and complicating the
> > code for such hair-splitting is not justified, IMO.
> 
> The problem I see is that we're displaying a general message, when a
> more specific one could have been displayed instead.  I'm not against
> fixing this minor blemish, if it can be done in a clean way.

Would it be enough to say something like

  Moved past last error, if any

?




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 225 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.