Subject: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none

From: Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 07:40:22 -0700

Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:

> Would it be enough to say something like
>
>   Moved past last error, if any
>
> ?

That has the problem that it's less specific than it could be.  So I'm
not sure it would be enough of an improvement to justify the change.

Perhaps it's better to do nothing here.