From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 03 04:20:00 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2023 08:20:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39187 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qciKu-0005HG-AN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 04:20:00 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:35450) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qciKq-0005Gz-7g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 04:19:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qciKa-0006vX-CK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 04:19:40 -0400 Received: from serval.cherry.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.223.163]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qciKX-0001cH-Vm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 04:19:40 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1D954116D for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 08:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a231.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 41AE2540E1D for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 08:19:32 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1693729172; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=2afUMbutmZhc2GJDtOyHdZIcSaDXGH2bag2g/kk55GqsqKhxlL3Q/svfJm2TH+4wxjlviX RHLIxdw6MDw4hB521YltT0hQqlnWM9A/G84KMsti0anLVp5J1XbSz6eI2j4lBmQ9MDC3pU HfDrk6ubufyPHV215cJoCRBE8ejvu3DtMojfId32GFKAt2k67NFxMtp4v/IB6tx9L6Kzlh aQENNhbztc/PH3SdsfUpXlG55NNaRO0sc6q8Bz8vu7YPV/GoSF2eEI/DcFWQpv0qWNtkZw uZDPI+GJAN8MDHZSCYb/EZrsGIT9ySnYjSK7JrdLHdMzVEmCDXBSXWGJ+ylw7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1693729172; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: dkim-signature; bh=x9LiyMwIhhAOGqcocCOVfRTkjgZF4te7KgfItPg1LBs=; b=E3W7xdE92qLXX+i7l8Gr7rjCShsIsvnRTUaJzD7TEumD7QDt7bNQEI14PzTL7oUsaXTkMQ UmHUOCZeW6mN4IRhc1YikHxZxZyia4hvLy+AlVgVFr05R8jP0Jb+Ro/FlpiIEe/qtXQp7B ie2sg4HWjCc6lq8gRqhW0LL+orUren2f7YmnfSFOVQ9aiZuKAZdxpZi8dR4z3C2soAGKpU PS1RTc7+UZFXt6T65EJBn/sESJCesHgZoZJN31omd9e0o7UvLKMaOzsRuPxDcDzQ31pOTJ O+wMXeItALoWvmjl4CaMvYDqabkMlDmuwZGzKctALC4lq2XueLv8VGb/9iGKbQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-bfd6864c7-wfrpc; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=jidanni@jidanni.org X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Juvenile-Coil: 7fbc78bb014fd743_1693729172477_2645916763 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1693729172477:4242811608 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1693729172477 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a231.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.117.184.116 (trex/6.9.1); Sun, 03 Sep 2023 08:19:32 +0000 Received: from jidanni.org (c-24-15-64-65.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.15.64.65]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a231.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Rdl6r0hxYz5B for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 01:19:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jidanni.org; s=dreamhost; t=1693729172; bh=x9LiyMwIhhAOGqcocCOVfRTkjgZF4te7KgfItPg1LBs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Content-Type; b=js4prRC1IyES/Iv6ttTja8kvBJBowNmr/HCMEquy9KI5jUmwGPC96SdVpA8KBX5sV b71HRchyg9ElTF9BUY7ZrS4iJJf4RH+p1YlB809DZrrpv5/QFFXDDaWbVzPdA1NF2j vWi3agRMZ6cVHkD4FAMgtibBJ6sJ4s6qwfDSsY70vi1jtIjmbXdQMYBymCTugBo9RR oBebIO1TQM7jkB3s6cGjLjV/P9qeSDM0OzEcyzU6QSWI11wGX0wvcdv7YkJHsqaghs eNMaz3gpsaQY9UHLZ3jnpFMrz8sE25AJu4wt/ZfQYCXKwxl6dyVUhWXhv3BF1FruoG I69AOa82JuZqA== From: Dan Jacobson To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 03:19:30 -0500 Message-ID: <87o7ij7jot.8.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=23.83.223.163; envelope-from=jidanni@jidanni.org; helo=serval.cherry.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error even if there was no errors that it found. So it should differentiate such cases. M-x compile make make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. OK, there was no error, so instead of "Moved past last error" it should say "Didn't find any errors" when asked. emacs-version "29.1" From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 03 04:46:32 2023 Received: (at 65713) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2023 08:46:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39290 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qcika-0000Kf-7B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 04:46:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qcikO-0000KB-Ak for 65713@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 04:46:30 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcik8-00076u-F1; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 04:46:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=J+sdP160We3NaNvVYkw4wUElyMkUwwFIJ2V9gef1hX0=; b=XzG2J5Y9BoCQ c/bjRUkCq0Qx70gJk4v131G8k9reSR0WwXKAzGGG4ISJOs8jDNMl7zdag0m49ezzGRlgDD8nEqfpI nXuek4s7nz8K+rBTT+rqexEOlNyZmMKIXmL0eFGLiJzjTw8yancLMargOsLgOLs7urV/MUObl/J2+ 3MVtcxVx8L03Of/rnYyrhvpZqnnsaO+jaspttE1ZazHl6SlOeEE10wZX2nBvIqEc/TF9WzaUTCnye Wbm09qASby/yQ/dF+OjmtXtqCzIXPwqI7I6YdORYQTVlwbvJWy7pebA4gyIcoaS96MU8DoXjABE5m cBAfDMuIA0CbX6lE1mS9Ag==; Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 11:45:43 +0300 Message-Id: <838r9n8x1k.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dan Jacobson In-Reply-To: <87o7ij7jot.8.fsf@jidanni.org> (message from Dan Jacobson on Sun, 03 Sep 2023 03:19:30 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none References: <87o7ij7jot.8.fsf@jidanni.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65713 Cc: 65713@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Dan Jacobson > Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 03:19:30 -0500 > > compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error > even if there was no errors that it found. > So it should differentiate such cases. > M-x compile > > make > make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. > > OK, there was no error, so instead of "Moved past last error" it should > say "Didn't find any errors" when asked. FWIW, I don't see any need for such a feature. "Moved past the last error" is correct even if there are no errors, and complicating the code for such hair-splitting is not justified, IMO. So my vote is to close this as "wontfix". From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 03 05:01:12 2023 Received: (at 65713) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2023 09:01:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39344 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qciyl-0003PO-TY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 05:01:12 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::234]:53472) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qciyh-00033n-J1 for 65713@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 05:01:11 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bb9a063f26so5884871fa.2 for <65713@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 02:00:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693731651; x=1694336451; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=H5fPOVzZLRzyAuLZ61OrPyZgXgWCDCOHWUlD2Q9AOQw=; b=sOOVOWmDp6L5T5XIQK6yEysCtnlTimVTay89ldqSUSIlt5NT5zvUqaLbSY4+jlO4MO jfYiuxrtdXotBQLNiWOqTFr40NyBcSWyPdFaZ0og4yncFkzq4fg0j960VUz2uULDiHXN SF8DOcqkoEHXRAG7GQzrP0W3M6fNwz0sMjl4qQX70hI6vq+wod1IxPqeRiFrHEmm3V4i wYScfZPySaXb1QxXzKTu27/iJLMVAdJdzY4hRAm6/Q8lAVskuKRiZPUxsrYy/2oBE6VK lSncBkDYQjBshTPmRDb6RUGnlkc6SvS69+IEJkVbyenQYMVZqdv/xaS0hDTdzSsJ2TcC Zf7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693731651; x=1694336451; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=H5fPOVzZLRzyAuLZ61OrPyZgXgWCDCOHWUlD2Q9AOQw=; b=Yn5SyyaVlyFy91NiFc5YQ1LtdOZI7y0TGc37CI11kPddPCt+JQYl36WJmXn9bQT5fo wkVJHtz5gYNmwdq6mTXzOjpIkjlKhQZfh6G+AGwAxc47ZEIvyjTRzBwuHR8JQFBqLki0 gdTw/7vum1L/p04AndSiKYWnr6mIy8qtiITZGGIDm7aPpfz66CiX8If0LkJNdA8KP9mC vqJegflc/waE8+0+gjCi3Oz6Pq9Oz6yBZ05g3VXhFPd7X4wG5oNIjZVGaXgqAE1vywpz TN/6ilbKxMBpCy1GSqHb3+7Umk6AEVkgIx+yNEw4xUN8oziOM2EMCFAAfNVtKQi3SiiY zkrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwM3qboM6nGDSl0v8+Pu1xp5eWUFCK1qcxSZVxnEvcwJ+LzRyNh UrZg+/taMHZ4+VU+hU2rmEQCRt4hiBYln+rNDFI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHTETQPe+kky3kq//4MpmgyOLJBn2mgFS4lDotAJMSfodWPDKF8USGU+K+DcvgxMY0N+DP8LUZsGW3M/f4O5BM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:398b:b0:4fa:da4f:636f with SMTP id j11-20020a056512398b00b004fada4f636fmr5823595lfu.32.1693731651173; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 02:00:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 02:00:50 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <838r9n8x1k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o7ij7jot.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <838r9n8x1k.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 02:00:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none To: Eli Zaretskii , Dan Jacobson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65713 Cc: 65713@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> OK, there was no error, so instead of "Moved past last error" it should >> say "Didn't find any errors" when asked. > > FWIW, I don't see any need for such a feature. "Moved past the last > error" is correct even if there are no errors, and complicating the > code for such hair-splitting is not justified, IMO. The problem I see is that we're displaying a general message, when a more specific one could have been displayed instead. I'm not against fixing this minor blemish, if it can be done in a clean way. This bug report would be more compelling if it came with a patch, of course. > So my vote is to close this as "wontfix". That's also an option, yes. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 03 05:08:15 2023 Received: (at 65713) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2023 09:08:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qcj5b-0003pz-En for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 05:08:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56944) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qcj5Z-0003pb-D1 for 65713@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 05:08:13 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcj5J-0006JA-J4; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 05:07:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=pZ+lqknaQqK5yp21rB5rgu5ZYZlIiyV9ZZMgxdm5KzM=; b=jG3xBSaSZfsC uBE3nDW2wvAQHrCWzLEs+T3twih24wE6lHgZud9jTvGjvyA2SkxrCd/QsxkBQIwKLJQij+xLpQPrD ya8C/mHletVwj1P4ZN8pKFyl14655rRPgRrLUHtXUJkiayrBlqCFacVHuG8PbZ/k23UQjfnn/8x/P QG0RDUCsx8f/6UVIWJQ5lALTq2k+/I8HZ95YFUWpAUkAaEpMFvh7iLKU0rDrww3+vAmEyVW6MURUH qYpQc4CxbIuLDJdVANwiu7J293ib+7OQdyDUVUtknUuGWUjiqWIuWwNH41EHEF1Dhn0CP1JHJbBV0 twimU2aDru3XaWzAF85eiA==; Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 12:07:36 +0300 Message-Id: <831qff8w13.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sun, 3 Sep 2023 02:00:50 -0700) Subject: Re: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none References: <87o7ij7jot.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <838r9n8x1k.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65713 Cc: 65713@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 02:00:50 -0700 > Cc: 65713@debbugs.gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> OK, there was no error, so instead of "Moved past last error" it should > >> say "Didn't find any errors" when asked. > > > > FWIW, I don't see any need for such a feature. "Moved past the last > > error" is correct even if there are no errors, and complicating the > > code for such hair-splitting is not justified, IMO. > > The problem I see is that we're displaying a general message, when a > more specific one could have been displayed instead. I'm not against > fixing this minor blemish, if it can be done in a clean way. Would it be enough to say something like Moved past last error, if any ? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 03 06:54:32 2023 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2023 10:54:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qckkS-0003g0-3V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 06:54:32 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::135]:51532) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qckkQ-0003fn-9O for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 06:54:31 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50079d148aeso916827e87.3 for ; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 03:54:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693738454; x=1694343254; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u2EzmLQ17Mdq2v1QJAoUgmTrIv2jEqc7i7FLSAVB/d4=; b=SUjGz64QZ9Zn04Rjqloh3d4T3yaCVtSR6JCrF7e4FcQWezC4CAqAcZnfoLycwAIKMf mQPeupa0bsJIupsXbCw/0jeArPXTK2xVwKf2dALfYEmsu9z5QW20K/2TjHPVvuiewWZE 9eVQSdzkcJUqOh5j0UMbOmP7kfpS4fqpJRBVhdW4PPUvAaJUolShC5+dm9wRSG+v2gAo Af1e2H/FxqAXf7HUbLyUHbL+Aj8P4REMgbvFRgcIMzYEBjeFiv+BXZTyC2KoApyMGItw KJeIlhmnMDGZIN7wsdsbsLrTYQ1Be83j5IwSQxNP63P/V/0IXoG/HqVuOLEmr0n3/v9D hmUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693738454; x=1694343254; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u2EzmLQ17Mdq2v1QJAoUgmTrIv2jEqc7i7FLSAVB/d4=; b=IAIQJRdB8qbe7ymul6UDX8UW4XKH0So6Yv0uxhj9sy3TMeakt6oJxmaqP6jXcstOz8 AFbYF4WUDghv/0KatWcGjtpL4wITU20wuQ+ae1nYUSY6q0iKBmcQxR1x7BshW1TMaTZQ KntFPzIyVKBWQEa38KMprotOv9jxytEh6bxnUNSQqq/jncPGDaL4ayHj/cjIFnB8D6Fz 9JjHFxYwfJXPxcf2Ta9leBNdLGcA3xGjX5pu2qFcmaYrdJyVTIeYD4lY4y6ydJhn3fzR NwN19wMbCYKq/AyJOfzjOEAghc53vnbMO96AYJpHfx4mCfdD6eKlICCfjYjKD3aTDpsB +WUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwWfbdoNOy2SQ1N6mj6y9gx7Rbn1m/W7sYClRCC4Umgu+83vteX oLV618eY3WblQRo6oeaKMNADCbj0ybE5JBGIkdA6S4170l8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF/IOLIl1DGnR7hSPlz4fd9tMw3cPxEPXIX7qB0VVxDhbpfmabKX3NMb57T/ugdpTy9o7+A8sKXK13S11Clu1U= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:a8e:b0:4ff:7f7f:22e7 with SMTP id m14-20020a0565120a8e00b004ff7f7f22e7mr6210124lfu.17.1693738453756; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 03:54:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 03:54:13 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 03:54:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: control message for bug #65713 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) severity 65713 wishlist quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 03 10:08:09 2023 Received: (at 65713) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2023 14:08:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43239 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qcnlp-0003Lo-4h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 10:08:09 -0400 Received: from insect.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.93]:25658) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qcnlj-0003La-F6 for 65713@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 10:08:07 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C2090016E; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 14:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a231.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3ABF9900704; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 14:07:51 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1693750071; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=klS3O6oPeT3nIYiQ+rJKQPh1tVBrt5ShU2wx96m0o7n8FmaBwEIKgNKJ6gJhf7ZvZntID1 ImTaaX871fOXulIEK93uqfreXTO1wtDQCbOI7h3AfOSULJwWTMEOv7nDVOylOAhersAWnD UHIbHAlGL9gnznkLAaMi1oqyQaWFPEMSYHZHdrib9z5zwTp6Buj8NfwHUiHmcOGECYtdkR CHFLbOFCROUva8R7GvceuO23jf+PkXRq3uJOEJmzQCYzkTDLFfu+htZ3rjJ37IKem2yTfF xxJ+8v5n600w0AuGNt7Z2v4+5lzTRbxNoqbkEZmzbNEiAlEuJjiITZ41AuEXNQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1693750071; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references:dkim-signature; bh=GOipUqNBz1uVd69xb/6t21Ecp0aIeXvrpdRJ5BJSCkw=; b=l5o1l5PM+yGSbOOiruOWnvC7EuqC+bCK6H/tTyVBZHlHSTppEwp2uAdEzx/0Yke2fcPGV0 4qxassLTQiM3UPyQ5hGVA3xgZsUez55b5uG3SozhxpLAgnr42sa8s4xHVOPYOvVWdiG2lp JREx+NJT7bmLWt5ZYcjJzxd8toW8EFo4SLbjP6nlbdQ9BtRG8XGmS3F2SrXHZwN8ybim1U BSdkOfrOttgUfWMvwjSjNUCdSxLVfnWMZ0n41m5sEL7Pqr9Km8okIQZtdIb6dm+n7y44gy r1CDODlo+EsWtNgtDZpCMm1050vR6b0k1cBn2307IHWjAbvLU6w9yO6HvBXoxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-6fd95854bb-sqntd; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=jidanni@jidanni.org X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Coil-Thread: 2e391a3a2951efa7_1693750071473_1250861780 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1693750071473:811470826 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1693750071473 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a231.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.98.74.174 (trex/6.9.1); Sun, 03 Sep 2023 14:07:51 +0000 Received: from jidanni.org (c-24-15-64-65.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.15.64.65]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a231.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Rdtrl01H8z1C; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 07:07:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jidanni.org; s=dreamhost; t=1693750071; bh=GOipUqNBz1uVd69xb/6t21Ecp0aIeXvrpdRJ5BJSCkw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Content-Type; b=YLwKPVIqe3xmYPwsPb/tyXzri6jKEmPI15j23EXQWYnPAXT/WNWHltfoOHlBij/hU uNOtG7nBCNavQqnn+lYVdoUNrWclEPWzPlLEcYSRWmqst56r9y2o5RQjj6qsxmoWiC RJTRr3ZeL9qOy7DnELSYzNV/G/zIOa1IR+ppr66lHZK1gjjNGHUqd/ly2NYy9JcaeU A9OXRcOo2S36YeJFlqWiMZKcoEVcOywtRXrDEO/ilTxcdXIim7MfwtLG/QPmBm1Exn 607rcnFQlkj0TC+Ja2gMGYsH2IiOrj2NAaZvVYWnLHZtFgu9ovSmkGBCIpcGdVvysZ hQZ3Dyudx0QRQ== From: Dan Jacobson To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none References: <87o7ij7jot.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <838r9n8x1k.fsf@gnu.org> <831qff8w13.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 09:07:49 -0500 Message-ID: <87cyyzbb9m.8.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65713 Cc: 65713@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: EZ> Would it be enough to say something like EZ> Moved past last error, if any OK, that would make me feel better. That way at least I wouldn't go on wild goose chases looking for the error I missed. Actually I still would, but at least I wouldn't feel as bad when I didn't find any. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 03 13:09:06 2023 Received: (at 65713) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2023 17:09:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46712 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qcqau-0000El-VV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 13:09:05 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]:57506) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qcqam-0000E9-3o for 65713@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 13:09:02 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bd0bc8b429so10887411fa.2 for <65713@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 10:08:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693760930; x=1694365730; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PXe9YNlsTa4BPHz09i/k5etrhEFwpfUjM342CGayJA8=; b=hfffqT0mNOe6kRwaspvoVDQ4lRJbRSYKWBEdVWPdxQvxd73u/2YJvxZQI1uIAKPTBI KgpustbsAP5NR5YUoFHR1XjLMISrLrRdD5d883SYNL4Z/83EpQL2U4Z0ngh4f4hNMRmf lcHmw8W9zISvFkxVeWhi331S6JXRk1qCJjwnonnN382aQK/fCWQx/ilkJiyi3h342CcS ibEkSwio4c/1RIMk4VvSKpAFvwn/Tw1AqARSD2fmfqkL5Bw+XqKzha/ERQrYcnoB2L+D VMgXlviYAheGvMIzhXOriqrT23vdoBsR+hayKOkes303EQhuYnYz0KOytUhDuFNLr8KZ 6Zpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693760930; x=1694365730; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PXe9YNlsTa4BPHz09i/k5etrhEFwpfUjM342CGayJA8=; b=jDRmLc25v7foux2XFyH2nrbEKUJc0UomK1FenVheS112/mDMH74z77DnUhFQBrXqL2 El+Mhe2nTPpCdb+gVPZ5qtGw9O22qdrDkb2fmnCQuxPtq29Zh9rkjzwVl4sJAZuj3O/5 r63OhnxDVb0+UwxPT2QRh4YmckTyeFFysCm9ze3zGZyHAUH86dstLGOhim2zdm9hkQx4 6ByGMS2c8b9c1v9QLcd414zpsci04tg0F9Ot3JwPgfzcwJPmy6BIIwMB3lEV76NTqTre I3f2MGV7zLwbe40gcBKbIdAZAd94erIIW00ZDFubewPo/NfXho5MU8Zkkk0Jb1Kwmqwv KJdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy0ElHDZJY9eBA0qerW+RY+yPdQaVv00M+J5QApq5EF1qDvNVAY pr2Eagm/Dbh/x56EJXI7V0AouV/rb8Jgs8gvP1OD318iVwg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFHuePJqG76I77c/KyapndQglGKOvVlfnoCa4nFJRiYsQ7N6hJWGilrCintF/MWJnwHGm4gieXHX0v2idkCYfQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3da8:b0:500:b3f2:73e2 with SMTP id k40-20020a0565123da800b00500b3f273e2mr6149289lfv.50.1693752022808; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 07:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 07:40:22 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <831qff8w13.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o7ij7jot.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <838r9n8x1k.fsf@gnu.org> <831qff8w13.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 07:40:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65713 Cc: 65713@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Would it be enough to say something like > > Moved past last error, if any > > ? That has the problem that it's less specific than it could be. So I'm not sure it would be enough of an improvement to justify the change. Perhaps it's better to do nothing here. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 04 18:57:21 2023 Received: (at 65713) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2023 22:57:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52903 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdIVV-0005k0-1n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2023 18:57:21 -0400 Received: from st43p00im-zteg10073501.me.com ([17.58.63.180]:53304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdIVQ-0005jj-R8 for 65713@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2023 18:57:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai; t=1693868230; bh=tMa8MvCisvPTDqBCCULXX9L6+5gIBt2dIrQQw8YSH/M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=F8Bjuhcm2EFJtmF7LmUWULFvAbfz6hAdvCxICwvMk9ELKrH3LZCgcrAddmlszF8q/ U0meYGekpsDDHtkBFahACwIDEWEjpqFJMquHY5nkDbAWqvrBj7cI1eB8WsCtP806zJ YCBtoZpAHQcU3jT+YxrMon4WLvtIk95ybYya5B3aCBTq3oubbitnrhrjDef8atAp7A Yx41TyQ3Mdity/xBemyIlA4m0kNyZwy5Fz0j9+8+B/1U54DOc2Hdg3DjSFz/Xx5ixt Duc3VmzXcVT+7jwzWorjRY36JjevqKK8I//5WhvFMW0w6uG8ANYopf90UigNTClul0 5w2djKgvXokIA== Received: from Rudolfs-MacBook-Air.local (st43p00im-dlb-asmtp-mailmevip.me.com [17.42.251.41]) by st43p00im-zteg10073501.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2601360289; Mon, 4 Sep 2023 22:57:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Rudolf =?utf-8?Q?Adamkovi=C4=8D?= To: Eli Zaretskii , Dan Jacobson Subject: Re: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none In-Reply-To: <838r9n8x1k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o7ij7jot.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <838r9n8x1k.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:57:07 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 6NGVMxOfIKvsajCYULKSVf7_RKW8Biha X-Proofpoint-GUID: 6NGVMxOfIKvsajCYULKSVf7_RKW8Biha X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: =?UTF-8?Q?vendor=3Dfsecure_engine=3D1.1.170-22c6f66c430a71ce266a39bfe25bc?= =?UTF-8?Q?2903e8d5c8f:6.0.573,18.0.957,17.11.170.22.0000000_definitions?= =?UTF-8?Q?=3D2023-05-18=5F15:2023-05-17=5F02,2023-05-18=5F15,2023-02-09?= =?UTF-8?Q?=5F01_signatures=3D0?= X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=445 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2309040207 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65713 Cc: 65713@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > FWIW, I don't see any need for such a > feature. For what is worth, as a long-term heavy user of the Compilation mode, I find the message confusing as well, on a daily basis. > "Moved past the last error" is correct even > if there are no errors, [...] Is it really correct to say that the point "moved" when it did not move? Rudy --=20 "The introduction of suitable abstractions is our only mental aid to organize and master complexity." -- Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 1930-2002 Rudolf Adamkovi=C4=8D [he/him] Studenohorsk=C3=A1 25 84103 Bratislava Slovakia From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 05 07:16:24 2023 Received: (at 65713) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2023 11:16:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54441 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdU2h-0000Fi-PN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 07:16:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46468) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qdU2f-0000FV-QN for 65713@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 07:16:22 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qdU2X-00041E-5u; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 07:16:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=K+QzvSshVpuNcOodQDMqkK8ddRHvK3bSVDNxGEYAcgI=; b=k7fyzYFtNQe3v75Fq2ng 9LZV2E9HJCDp7g5ikwt3a8M2hCgYLWGFh2aqoz5QF5VJ80Wnctfq82R44NwPRRloyNFCan4MHOuYi UT/UCIShP7Wu9/H/4pPBwNMmIbrvnkSp7OYh7UxseAL3tMuCr7GqiEBAzf/h5Aqpa9UWRimAOyeJe qYXM5Hh/9ESGcNbVpITNDSMWP5w7BGE+JuGVxsqNova7i5cfoD40HrnUYRdUsIr5K9tMuoSw31ohP YJzsWVSzqYHp5b5ux47VNeRCgwTkpb5fRgaAvnNniGhEyWeOy1l4fXjn9HaoohBNF1N4C21MNcg4/ u/WhggvTtFTdKQ==; Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 14:15:57 +0300 Message-Id: <83il8o50r6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Rudolf =?utf-8?Q?Adamkovi=C4=8D?= In-Reply-To: (message from Rudolf =?utf-8?Q?Adamko?= =?utf-8?Q?vi=C4=8D?= on Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:57:07 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none References: <87o7ij7jot.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <838r9n8x1k.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65713 Cc: 65713@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Rudolf Adamkovič > Cc: 65713@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:57:07 +0200 > > > "Moved past the last error" is correct even > > if there are no errors, [...] > > Is it really correct to say that the point > "moved" when it did not move? Would it help to remove the "Moved" part? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 03 16:18:41 2023 Received: (at 65713) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2023 20:18:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40752 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qnlqq-0004hH-La for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 16:18:40 -0400 Received: from mr85p00im-zteg06023901.me.com ([17.58.23.192]:54334) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qnlqo-0004h3-Jd for 65713@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 16:18:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai; t=1696364295; bh=qd/Um2dnN76Niw+Lc++VNm5EXwU5ECFQhakeFikg5PQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Z1vCKoxRbmPzL0WWgo1HrGvG0ds4rkfWc4OThPfQ1kPLesi0SA6P2SNFGo+tk/KIh bZHN5SeZOytL+6uRzQdKlqmFzLFlCI0ATDJKs0RkfNdOkw5KpCEde/ITz11e6ja55Y n1GR1wz2+nsSEA33ZPu8p63sd6iucfooL0keWqM06MjKG72yx4/m1g4zgVwS3f5gKz MkyvW5MjLs90hBSTydz/Kgc28hy9BE7wjVx05UMv5EZiC0CJvoYXv57sPmQSynlBwk N99/oo8Nh7l/2WwcH+Ty8PIqRNIDEF/WsMcDTWAgXkUrRKV3v5rLetxlfbmrAevNSE aZ4kUyuU6pFFQ== Received: from Rudolfs-MacBook-Air.local (mr38p00im-dlb-asmtp-mailmevip.me.com [17.57.152.18]) by mr85p00im-zteg06023901.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 373A76E0370; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 20:18:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Rudolf =?utf-8?Q?Adamkovi=C4=8D?= To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none In-Reply-To: <83il8o50r6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o7ij7jot.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <838r9n8x1k.fsf@gnu.org> <83il8o50r6.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 22:18:06 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 6z-5Sz2wYOrt4T2rj8rMghyrDlz5bxdI X-Proofpoint-GUID: 6z-5Sz2wYOrt4T2rj8rMghyrDlz5bxdI X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: =?UTF-8?Q?vendor=3Dfsecure_engine=3D1.1.170-22c6f66c430a71ce266a39bfe25bc?= =?UTF-8?Q?2903e8d5c8f:6.0.425,18.0.572,17.0.605.474.0000000_definitions?= =?UTF-8?Q?=3D2022-01-14=5F01:2022-01-14=5F01,2020-02-14=5F11,2020-01-23?= =?UTF-8?Q?=5F02_signatures=3D0?= X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=549 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2308100000 definitions=main-2310030153 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65713 Cc: 65713@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Is it really correct to say that the point >> "moved" when it did not move? > > Would it help to remove the "Moved" part? That sounds like a good idea. Rudy --=20 "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing noise they make as they go by." -- Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt, 2002 Rudolf Adamkovi=C4=8D [he/him] Studenohorsk=C3=A1 25 84103 Bratislava Slovakia From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 05 04:03:01 2023 Received: (at 65713-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2023 08:03:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45968 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qoJK0-0006CL-SO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 04:03:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53436) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qoJJz-0006C5-3B for 65713-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 04:03:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qoJJa-0000sr-Rn; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 04:02:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=cRZFiZcQw4NClUVsEQvryTAMygpzFHTGhyduvIvznvE=; b=Qh78EKjO0lgezM0vrxxD i6NWaRGE8pRAKYmU4RRWT/0OApFKuYo2bQkkaWt9/iTKMiX35nA+qNwjKdjFVWpsl9SUnV54202cm 1YBEd/uEJSGlARmYweYcY2nsGHxOAV5mawZtBEjz/IjVW3bgWSiG34FJYnMBepnew086TCg8MsQOv gFR6cnij2X8wgbaEvf50fTHFL0b+5CF1tqbDYqfU9xJe6j4lTBbTiDZ8H9E0v5ywaoSZyQCiqoTIC RNK7+gf0z1hFu3nuSBy94jIadFQRwRIn/enO7d1eho+jQe2Z9IysN4PNP7GWRH0UufQSaT1dS+sVC 3wTUCB0UDQRUQw==; Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 11:02:41 +0300 Message-Id: <83cyxt4hum.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Rudolf =?utf-8?Q?Adamkovi=C4=8D?= In-Reply-To: (message from Rudolf =?utf-8?Q?Adamko?= =?utf-8?Q?vi=C4=8D?= on Tue, 03 Oct 2023 22:18:06 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#65713: compilation-next-error says: Moved past last error, even when none References: <87o7ij7jot.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <838r9n8x1k.fsf@gnu.org> <83il8o50r6.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65713-done Cc: 65713-done@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Rudolf Adamkovič > Cc: jidanni@jidanni.org, 65713@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 22:18:06 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Is it really correct to say that the point > >> "moved" when it did not move? > > > > Would it help to remove the "Moved" part? > > That sounds like a good idea. Done on master, and closing the bug. From unknown Sat Jun 14 18:05:57 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator