GNU bug report logs - #65700
time when gcs-done is updated needs to be clarified

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Shynur Xie <one.last.kiss <at> outlook.com>, 65700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65700: time when gcs-done is updated needs to be clarified
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 09:38:35 -0400

>> I wrote a function which runs each time Emacs collects garbage, so I
>> added it to `post-gc-hook'.
>> 
>> That function cares about the value of `gcs-done' and the value of
>> `gc-elapsed'.  But it seems that `gcs-done' is updated after
>> `post-gc-hook' is executed?

Indeed, from what I see in the code, `gc-elapsed` and `gcs-done` are
updated *after* running `post-gc-hook`.
This means for example that the time to run `post-gc-hook` is included
in the `gc-elapsed` time.

>> Is this an intended behavior?

Good question.  AFAICT this was added by the following commit:

    commit 2c5bd60800ce4f2702f263eda2145be342208ffe
    Author: Dave Love <fx <at> gnu.org>
    Date:   Thu Jan 30 14:15:58 2003 +0000
    
        (Vgc_elapsed, gcs_done): New variables.
        (Fgarbage_collect): Use them.
        (init_alloc, syms_of_alloc): Set them up.
    
    diff --git a/src/alloc.c b/src/alloc.c
    --- a/src/alloc.c
    +++ b/src/alloc.c
    @@ -4367,7 +4373,15 @@
       if (!NILP (Vpost_gc_hook))
         {
           int count = inhibit_garbage_collection ();
           safe_run_hooks (Qpost_gc_hook);
           unbind_to (count, Qnil);
         }
    -  
    +
    +  /* Accumulate statistics.  */
    +  EMACS_GET_TIME (t2);
    +  EMACS_SUB_TIME (t3, t2, t1);
    +  if (FLOATP (Vgc_elapsed))
    +    XSETFLOAT (Vgc_elapsed, make_float (XFLOAT_DATA (Vgc_elapsed) +
    +					EMACS_SECS (t3) +
    +					EMACS_USECS (t3) * 1.0e-6));
    +  gcs_done++;

The only related commit I see around that time is the associated NEWS
message:

    ** New variables `gc-elapsed' and `gcs-done' provide extra information
    on garbage collection.

So I strongly suspect that it was largely accidental.  "Philosophically",
both choices make sense (either consider `post-gc-hook` as being part of
the GC or consider it as external to the GC).

I'd be curious to know how it affects your code.


        Stefan

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.