From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 29 09:49:45 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2023 13:49:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49889 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qaz6H-0005CP-2l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 09:49:45 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:46074) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qaz6D-0005C7-7r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 09:49:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaz60-0001FC-8h for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 09:49:28 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaz5x-0006Le-BO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 09:49:28 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50043cf2e29so6822268e87.2 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 06:49:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693316961; x=1693921761; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:subject:to:from:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GoaUmtQ4Nlp6e4yGc5zKRyChGVwgSz4NIGhKXSWyf1Q=; b=mUZCQ7DARlOrIgdh4kdNky1hw+BmDYFstSaGvHq8/n62eo7381crSurp9+swnDKkxL goi0WphZEBLZi4v6ZHkcW25jWZLxVHVld2+wwPNtnYnlMLJLorcHgGE9gqSW/nADDLYt VO16eKAmmY6v6Z3xHCmKt6Y9cN3slVelrIvWuSkwc5KztOjAd9ZSiaoyVCEwhFnf7ioA 1rLw5V9BAASoO72rkDVySoz+Qzq1S3321IUM+fsmyzDiOvXDuRhmunK18y9isxU5keUd 3MF+pf1ReJFsmfR9ybPF11BKW4W5FPbcznnTyjfX8hWpkVyCi/ZKNgtWrhJ+RtbRcnmF GnLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693316961; x=1693921761; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:subject:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GoaUmtQ4Nlp6e4yGc5zKRyChGVwgSz4NIGhKXSWyf1Q=; b=GY3Ox0Ppy0PNUnTu8HI2bSFNL8VoLpIG/L1kAGQMtjIxyPjfkmDQsTQ29V9QbipuSR KAtB0ixrJK9jjDEKYtWKyKciT/CtyzNYU5xkys6VzrgnHgfgQ+EXvg5T6T+aAvMpKTrA jXIxOkfPQG8joyI2AuaNEAbW2lSJ6lwI/lS2aSHCoQRTQ87IlaLCHx0evE2IzjfDMt/w xrsPke3aBwzHXdz3Ajur+LLAI2gtv22SxtqRyt5TXgylKRCTFz42EDZ5zlQ0tf9CvlsC EAjI3QXDyslCbsAwg0yhG75OHdTsCS1YyX/mMXxcU+x/oHSuAh4NRWe4+YbnoqgThbIb o22Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwKVPQjs35oBTcsUndlgE1RfGBDOEKjgg/Xilq6Khq8SWSZAJtp xEogGWVuvhkEMj69msPwdRBcIrqGwJNLkg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF9+MBn1sT/EVRvdv2mVdIsz68Sntmt4ZM9i/EjdGweQRd3wCJDAYrFEph6WXo6y4TtXgwfTA== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4c42:0:b0:4fd:d213:dfd0 with SMTP id o2-20020ac24c42000000b004fdd213dfd0mr23943754lfk.11.1693316961307; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 06:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mini (82.131.65.23.cable.starman.ee. [82.131.65.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l30-20020ac2555e000000b004ff70c76208sm1986900lfk.84.2023.08.29.06.49.20 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Aug 2023 06:49:20 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_A=2E_Gomes?= To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.3.8 Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 16:49:19 +0300 Message-ID: <87bkeqj6w0.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12f; envelope-from=andremegafone@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x12f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Guix, Please find the patch attached. Thanks. --=20 Andr=C3=A9 A. Gomes "You cannot even find the ruins..." --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-gnu-sbcl-Update-to-2.3.8.patch >From 001395fa5fd21654cadb20e4f9daaa30e000396d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Andre A. Gomes" Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 16:48:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: sbcl: Update to 2.3.8. * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (sbcl): Update to 2.3.8. --- gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm index 6f425a6e4a..db9c644144 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm @@ -433,17 +433,15 @@ (define-public clisp (define-public sbcl (package (name "sbcl") - (version "2.3.5") + (version "2.3.8") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/sbcl/sbcl/" version "/sbcl-" version "-source.tar.bz2")) (sha256 - (base32 "11ji5n65l31249r0v7hm0wc0yk2ila0y746nj36xn1cxrwh0gjc9")) + (base32 "0a8dranh15gsbq51ssnvccl91mzqmgs5xsmwisz5hvlimjr725a2")) (modules '((guix build utils))) - ;; backport from upstream. - (patches (search-patches "sbcl-riscv-Make-contribs-build-again.patch")) (snippet '(begin ;; Don't force ARMv5. -- 2.41.0 --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 04 09:40:11 2023 Received: (at 65592) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2023 13:40:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49117 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qd9oI-0004s9-RU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2023 09:40:11 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:41107) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qd9oE-0004rU-FE for 65592@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2023 09:40:09 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51243240108 for <65592@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 4 Sep 2023 15:40:00 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693834800; bh=6GdNezWOWAcNTQfA6jMijNzU6lg5CtEp65ahYxMLF4I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=bxHXkI1S4HXKYFTIw4bjBGYN9jgj0c/9bMYECOLPYzwq+Ef16td6fi4kDjNC4foKG SD/4NPlZm+0aGw4UY+OFRWj/i6ZYfytIaQeuPilJ6DucodzIBX0xlqNxI8kWbzWG6/ FGGAGlO/F7XzU03l0a/tp0jrszdVu3bw7OP8tKHRfkfOXxMAm5rx7lSOLI4ppI/Vob iz3jlqyyUVN3QbkOkLQ5XowF+JpoyoGKxtRqK53BdfphFJhnpS+R7mNWxSBDlp+a3m Pwm1MG7mu9oLfEh1DJPGQg9XdsLiWcTQKocT+cV2I4BB4DQekwBUXJ10lD1rMWbt5k 8sB79gEs0sCBw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RfVB41y2gz6tyy; Mon, 4 Sep 2023 15:39:56 +0200 (CEST) References: <87bkeqj6w0.fsf@gmail.com> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_A=2E_Gomes?= Subject: Re: [bug#65592] [PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.3.8 Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2023 13:32:50 +0000 In-reply-to: <87bkeqj6w0.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87il8qhxas.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65592 Cc: 65592@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I applied a modified version of your patch (to remove the obsolete patch from the sources) on the lisp-team branch. When the CI machines have rebuilt the dependents, we'll merge the lisp-team branch into the master branch. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCZPXeKw8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j+8PQD9EE6Zfzg52TbTEhbNcu2ug5n80dVZjsuqKlmG WgBTdq0A+QG2vBBUIkRbde8TRsB/0tktHRtctAx/LGC00OqeWYxN =+SPp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 23 05:21:19 2023 Received: (at 65592-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2023 09:21:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37791 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qjypC-0001vN-RJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 05:21:19 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:33719) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qjypB-0001uv-J0 for 65592-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 05:21:17 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C08E7240101 for <65592-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 11:21:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Rt3XW6l6Jz6v5B; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 11:20:59 +0200 (CEST) References: <87bkeqj6w0.fsf@gmail.com> <87il8qhxas.fsf@kitej> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_A=2E_Gomes?= Subject: Re: [bug#65592] [PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.3.8 Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 09:16:58 +0000 In-reply-to: <87il8qhxas.fsf@kitej> Message-ID: <87ttrldz46.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65592-done Cc: 65592-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain SBCL 2.3.8 didn't build on riscv64, so instead version 2.3.7 is used for now. It has been merged in master at 4f35ff1275e05be31f5d41464ccf147e9dbfd016. Let's close this issue and open a new one for a future update of SBCL (maybe 2.3.9 will fix the build failure). --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCZQ6t+Q8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j/X4gEAmtlyI7IQEj6pCMwbCE4X4XiG+C6hA51nYfXw si/FDZ4A/jMnqtEaR3vjnQM5x9M1F2mIjeYmL+kju95fr9Xry2sy =jadz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 26 05:18:14 2023 Received: (at 65592-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2023 09:18:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47282 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ql4Cs-0006Fv-8P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:18:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::333]:46330) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ql4Cp-0006Fc-PH for 65592-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:18:12 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-405497850dbso63888455e9.0 for <65592-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 02:17:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1695719873; x=1696324673; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lBEyIntY+p4/psbqOw34WK2xAz61WwFR5rqxbJwBRpg=; b=BAb3WjvGa2jUvtSK96vs0A48xauR9pTcVcDbBjhfoS3D1EpGyGlSSebO9oaDj2qa23 YXoqEEgpbaVRh6+S3rw11uh7W1/a9BkhQEdlE6aYvLGN4pw9ySFiQyKx8sFn4Ry2ceKs ju0No2lp1KGDy+v4VOMXNl+i6jDH0PruOyq4tscg+YoK3Tu0Mjh8ivbEWlnYhcxpSO0s udjuDhutRiV0cogoZ1eP7NGtIfN5qtd1jFg1PDbVSDtvBZ2RYDGz4xbZL4v8Aw7a1Luo nDXVlpy/lFis8hmZ5ZZtS1H6IDmx3Kt77kKCwM4dPvymoB2+L4BShf1xx0WhkwX5IGAi 3aQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695719873; x=1696324673; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lBEyIntY+p4/psbqOw34WK2xAz61WwFR5rqxbJwBRpg=; b=trh/lRoVUz8QX64JQNMqgFCNiL0B8wKLXCen1yc8YGCmpBTO1ArvS/0wgcMHFuDEwL x8An+oojqyU+5SzRISX2KxW4ddmrBoiKaTcoepqureytzE31HRuYd47hkhmZUPK/jdvH XgS92Py2HSpFIBZOJaeRG6RRRTmkt9mlMWnkcEIyTae6/SwtkMHxOEa2OcKzmZzFXHby nRyCx0L8sOfrAwH7GixkqUMW3qABwyqM714OhuMEPS16wPDzkBdrudXz+XJ0GXNE19UE Cz9ftuI21yvwKbMkmiYt1MGaC9MtmjiA87DAtJeDMOocwpFfNjwIL86AIqABKlOcuAlG TScg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzCkXYSv1Zk6UA8dP/4CPalUSUzTSJyCZcjy2bUFjh6HwTpA7zp 6chjZ5sOEkEeYlm4JvXJTRZQsn+Mc2DmtQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHP1y9mBxZnPF4sDX21PQYTqWEGNbgvG6hoBKmULB5ze8QQWYE8q6xKYIM195Wynha3gCRZmg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:210a:b0:3fe:1cac:37d5 with SMTP id u10-20020a05600c210a00b003fe1cac37d5mr7784261wml.4.1695719872656; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 02:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mini ([2001:818:daa9:6700:3759:a94c:6f4f:4a58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n3-20020a05600c464300b0040536dcec17sm13689429wmo.27.2023.09.26.02.17.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 26 Sep 2023 02:17:52 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_A=2E_Gomes?= To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: [bug#65592] [PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.3.8 References: <87bkeqj6w0.fsf@gmail.com> <87il8qhxas.fsf@kitej> <87ttrldz46.fsf@kitej> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:17:51 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87ttrldz46.fsf@kitej> (Guillaume Le Vaillant's message of "Sat, 23 Sep 2023 09:16:58 +0000") Message-ID: <87lectl2dc.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65592-done Cc: 65592-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > SBCL 2.3.8 didn't build on riscv64, so instead version 2.3.7 is used for > now. It has been merged in master at > 4f35ff1275e05be31f5d41464ccf147e9dbfd016. > Let's close this issue and open a new one for a future update of SBCL > (maybe 2.3.9 will fix the build failure). Hi Guillaume, Just for future reference, is there a way for me to check whether a SBCL builds on all platforms when sending a patch? Thanks. --=20 Andr=C3=A9 A. Gomes "You cannot even find the ruins..." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 27 05:29:08 2023 Received: (at 65592-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2023 09:29:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50509 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qlQqx-00017C-K9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 05:29:07 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:35291) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qlQqt-00016f-LT for 65592-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 05:29:06 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C58CA240027 for <65592-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:28:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1695806923; bh=pdPJpJ1bk7/ZzpnZXISdUsPLVb9Oa5JDkweUaamoIqg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=dTQ+2WEX7huUhFx1X0ITzYFUTPUqebYYRY96jzAS3Su3M6afIdd7zQtmbI4fre1dn ZjvxI43wDE6t0alCSG43AMF+5y5xx0sIF1vpvY/uZQRW6mcBIWhMAAKG7YnoBozzkV ZqxnfstKijU1CiROlcJkAJJUCkTUb9A/fMc66B2s6DtlCkHwepMBOidfNqYaW3FsUe S9bCh6n2vrDVN5I7u56xHK5keGduws7BZ3vimjqWAHavQSQIRO5zsl0a1/pvardJlW Ag6KMUr+hUFnkmUHq+9zUrEm399nfOAeYmqnDoQE346yxFJL99JuJBcKDj0FVrSnys IYq0xdFGTvb0Q== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RwWWb0GJjz6tw9; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:28:42 +0200 (CEST) References: <87bkeqj6w0.fsf@gmail.com> <87il8qhxas.fsf@kitej> <87ttrldz46.fsf@kitej> <87lectl2dc.fsf@gmail.com> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_A=2E_Gomes?= Subject: Re: [bug#65592] [PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.3.8 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 09:03:27 +0000 In-reply-to: <87lectl2dc.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: <874jjgt16d.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 65592-done Cc: 65592-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andr=C3=A9 A. Gomes skribis: > Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > >> SBCL 2.3.8 didn't build on riscv64, so instead version 2.3.7 is used for >> now. It has been merged in master at >> 4f35ff1275e05be31f5d41464ccf147e9dbfd016. >> Let's close this issue and open a new one for a future update of SBCL >> (maybe 2.3.9 will fix the build failure). > > Hi Guillaume, > > Just for future reference, is there a way for me to check whether a SBCL > builds on all platforms when sending a patch? Thanks. For x86_64, i686, aarch64, armhf and powerpc64le, you can check on . However so far the CI doesn't have builds for riscv64, because it doesn't have riscv64 hardware. Efraim Flashner has a riscv64 board with Guix on it, and he is the one who tried building SBCL 2.3.8 and saw the failure. If you are using a Guix system, you could also add the qemu-binfmt-service-type to your system definition, which gives the possibility to build packages for some other architectures with: guix build -s riscv64-linux PACKAGE-NAME Unfortunately, qemu-binfmt has difficulties running SBCL on foreign architectures, and building SBCL for aarch64 or riscv64 on a x86_64 machine fails with an error about a missing tty or something like that. However, trying the build with qemu-binfmt can still be useful, because if compilation fails before getting to the tty error, it usually indicates that the package has an issue on this architecture. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCZRP1yg8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j/fDgD+MEDR2E/TwgOPXgBfREoO/xMbJbX7KJxiP5Wt Jj3u99oA/3/r53aZjGjZa+isM7fIPFWNMIjyl7ylrOPORcF8I2Fp =IVed -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 27 06:46:55 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2023 10:46:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50586 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qlS4E-0000DW-Ky for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 06:46:55 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:52266) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qlS47-0000D7-Oj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 06:46:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qlS3n-0001se-BU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 06:46:28 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qlS3k-000408-SK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 06:46:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [217.155.61.229]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9046A27BBE2; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:46:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 7be7a87d; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:46:21 +0000 (UTC) References: <87bkeqj6w0.fsf@gmail.com> <87il8qhxas.fsf@kitej> <87ttrldz46.fsf@kitej> <87lectl2dc.fsf@gmail.com> <874jjgt16d.fsf@kitej> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.5; emacs 28.2 From: Christopher Baines To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: [bug#65592] [PATCH]: Update sbcl to 2.3.8 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:44:10 +0100 In-reply-to: <874jjgt16d.fsf@kitej> Message-ID: <874jjfevwi.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.71.252.8; envelope-from=mail@cbaines.net; helo=mira.cbaines.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_A=2E_Gomes?= , guix-patches@gnu.org, 65592-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > Andr=C3=A9 A. Gomes skribis: > >> Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: >> >>> SBCL 2.3.8 didn't build on riscv64, so instead version 2.3.7 is used for >>> now. It has been merged in master at >>> 4f35ff1275e05be31f5d41464ccf147e9dbfd016. >>> Let's close this issue and open a new one for a future update of SBCL >>> (maybe 2.3.9 will fix the build failure). >> >> Hi Guillaume, >> >> Just for future reference, is there a way for me to check whether a SBCL >> builds on all platforms when sending a patch? Thanks. > > For x86_64, i686, aarch64, armhf and powerpc64le, you can check on > . Note that we're lacking sufficient powerpc64 hardware to do QA for that architecture. > However so far the CI doesn't have builds for riscv64, because it > doesn't have riscv64 hardware. Efraim Flashner > has a riscv64 board with Guix on it, and he is the one who tried > building SBCL 2.3.8 and saw the failure. We do however have RiscV hardware connected to the bordeaux build farm, I've got a machine and there's also a second connected. We probably need at least one more machine to enable the system for QA though. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmUUB/1fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xc00A/9HbYrPfjzG+mcaPA51wfj2zrCfoYVtLS2 HooK/gUEiOOAoQI+HNGldwNE+R6lhfg/CsDbaQsaVcv6NBFe8Suv2MRNDTQ0n+Mh iJuld7B/h+b2y+r8IOE7X1bxZICLdEGJERpgG5gTYgI8RLvExri0D2njow9rHwCm n6uj1SVmlnuSWJFtuYFsdXU33bhQ8bWWuoqy8p71Nz8eOH1uOVFJtG4y9PuNizML hZO3BNjOIyTbFrW+IKkTWr+6Wd71XkEipFfHI/YP4fwb9SZAuT5jcnzS4vlo/rW0 iaf1pH/xydO9tPheUI5o044p5rxOifO8r60JVQVnfX6cQQecCNmBsUhNUtyomDB1 8aTxdbRJrG3W8ge4FYTUwVoAWBP7KYrBw2OTsgplnUdL8v1DdeFUvBQDT2Uztc1B cnl4KEdjtfLWjCLp/MqH+lNJa5uAdsYMkmMeCmycwLphXMHVDlKX9hl8ot02N0SK wxVISn6KFziXooKITsrCWRAedwoiWoGWx9n/PGIJMmcAiJEmwsb4E7GU56S8/oSS 8aaiQizjnUJiYBjuKHPGjVdInnfS8o9EgkhS03AaAcK97b9W1q2PI722wQW6o8Vq fko1+7FDeyZClVKPLLsvbQEMlCqsv/W8jnDEtaUDglA+/VuIs0GuMjjA7tu7eJcp bQLXqGsuMaA= =fdu1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:17:50 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator