GNU bug report logs -
#65459
completing-read INITIAL-VALUE unaware of COLLECTION and REQUIRE-MATCH
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> Then, repeatedly hit <down>. You get
>
> alpha alpha beta gamma delta epsilon zeta eta alpha beta gamma and-so-on
Ah, OK, yes, that sounds like a problem (one I've heard before).
I think it's a problem in the cycling code rather than in INITIAL-VALUE
or COLLECTION. E.g. the same problem occurs if the initial input is
empty and the user types `alpha C-n`.
> You do actually get that the consecutive entries appearing in the
> minibuffer have direct correspondence to to order found in COLLECTION.
For that form of cycling, apparently so, yes. I don't categorize it as
"completion" so I haven't looked very closely at that code :-)
There are other ways to do cycling which use a different ordering.
The cycling through completions via `next-line-or-history-element` is
not very configurable, AFAICT.
> Once INITIAL is inserted, I cannot instruct completing-read to continue
> sequentially starting from a particular element.
Indeed.
> For instance, I cannot get the following result when using simple cycling
> through collection options when repeatedly hitting the <down> key.
>
> To achieve
>
> alpha epsilon zeta eta alpha beta gamma delta epsilon and-so-on
Could you give a bit more context about why/where you'd want to do that
so I can better imagine how to attack the problem?
Hopefully it would explain why you want "alpha epsilon ..." first but
"alpha beta .." later. Also for such uses of `completing-read` we
usually recommend against a non-nil value for INITIAL-INPUT, so that
context should try to explain why you use "alpha" as INITIAL-INPUT.
Stefan
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 289 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.