GNU bug report logs - #65456
[PATCH 0/2] Split guix build into more steps for 32bit hosts.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65456: closed ([PATCH 0/2] Split guix build into more steps
 for 32bit hosts.)
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:30:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2023 21:28:53 +0200
with message-id <87jztm98qy.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] self: Build gnu/packages/*.go in 26 steps.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #65456,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] Split guix build into more steps for 32bit hosts.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
65456: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65456
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Split guix build into more steps for 32bit hosts.
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:17:59 +0200

Hi!

Initially writter for the Hurd (see hurd-team
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=hurd-team&id=06438c2a7edf1f0c90392858fc86480c6e5c2195>,
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=hurd-team&id=5623ab503fa70eab95e6f859e82c89581c3f69f4>)
This afternoon on IRC, Maxim confirmed my suspicion that this could be 32bit
issue, rather than a Hurd problem
(<https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2023-08-22.log#182716>,
<https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1870536/log/raw>).

I didn't submit these for the Hurd yet, as I didn't really feel comfortable
with the 26-way split.  I tried a 5-way split and that still gave OOM errors
on the Hurd and I didn't feel like hand-coding a 10-way split, so yeah.

Also, the 5-way split in the Makefile.am will produce percentages over
100 which suggests a typo...but I couldn't spot it.

Lastly, these patches feel like a workaround for Guile / libgc memory
management?  Otoh, being able to build Guix on 32bit hosts is kinda nice
too... So yeah.

Greetings,
Janneke

Janneke Nieuwenhuizen (2):
  build: Build gnu/packages/*.go in five steps.
  self: Build gnu/packages/*.go in 26 steps on 32bit.

 Makefile.am   | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 guix/self.scm | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)


base-commit: c655231b72ac28b5a433069fcf86a835c9c83691
-- 
2.41.0

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
To: 65456-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] self: Build gnu/packages/*.go in 26 steps.
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 21:28:53 +0200

Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes:

After a LGTM from Ludo and discussing with Maxim on IRC, pushed to
master as 5898b2e8a3dbf7797e83b39a2783c5b543015725

Maxim suggested (<https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2023-08-22.log#211631>)
we could maybe use Guile in make to split building .go files in
Makefile.am algorithmically like we do in guix/self.scm.

Greetings,
Janneke

-- 
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>  | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org
Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® https://AvatarAcademy.com

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.