GNU bug report logs - #65451
30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made

Previous Next

Full log

Message #56 received at 65451 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>
Cc: casouri <at> gmail.com, 65451 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered
 in the same order the changes are made
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:25:35 +0300

> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>
> Cc: casouri <at> gmail.com, 65451 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 08:09:41 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> Elements of the list will be like
> >> [:buffer-chars-modified-tick :region-beginning :region-end-before-edit :region-end-after-edit]
> >
> > If you really need buffer-chars-modified-tick, you will have to verify
> > that it is updated before calling the function which updates the
> > "transactions list".
> 
> Do you mean that buffer-chars-modified-tick may not be yet updated at
> the time treesit_record_change is called?

Yes.  You can audit the code and see it for yourself.

> Then, treesit_record_change only uses byte positions. Will it be
> possible to record buffer point positions, or may it be problematic?

Sorry, I don't understand what you are saying here and how this is
relevant to the issue at hand and to my comment in particular.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.