GNU bug report logs - #65391
People need to report failing builds even though we have ci.guix.gnu.org for that

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>

Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 23:55:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: 65391 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65391: People need to report failing builds even though we have ci.guix.gnu.org for that
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 01:53:59 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
For example, naev used to work just fine, yet apparently it doesn't 
anymore: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65390.

Given that Guix has ci.guix.gnu.org, I would expect such new problems to 
be detected and resolved early, and it was detected by ci.guix.gnu.org, 
yet going by issues.guix.gnu.org it was never even investigated.

(Yes, there is a delay, but that doesn't matter at all, as there's this 
dashboard <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/668365/dashboard>.)

Do people really need to report 33% of all jobs 
(https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/668365/dashboard) before those failures 
are taken seriously, instead of the ‘there don't seem to be that much 
more build failures from the core-updates/... merge, let's solve them 
later (i.e., never)’ that seems to be  status quo?

Best regards,
Maxime Devos
[OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 191 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.