GNU bug report logs - #65387
[PATCH] New user option 'submit-emacs-patch-display-help'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com>

Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 19:34:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #11 received at 65387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 65387 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65387: [PATCH] New user option
 'submit-emacs-patch-display-help'
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 22:56:18 +0200
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 21:33:14 +0200
>> From:  Eshel Yaron via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>> 
>> This patch adds a user option for disabling the *Patch Help* buffer that
>> `submit-emacs-patch` displays.
>
> Thanks, but why is it important to be able to disable the
> instructions, enough to justify this new option?  I expect experienced
> people not to use this command at all, so its main purpose is for the
> newbies.

Ah I actually find this command quite convenient, except for that
instructions buffer that tends to get in my way.  So I guess this option
is useful for us semi-newbies :)

I don't know if it justifies a new option, as you say, and I don't mind
keeping a modified `submit-emacs-patch` in my config.

I do wonder, since `(info "(emacs)Sending Patches")` recommends using
`submit-emacs-patch` and that always seemed easier than doing `C-x m`
and adding the destination address and the attachment patch afterwards,
what alternative you'd expect experienced users to go with?


Thanks,

Eshel




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 251 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.