GNU bug report logs - #65380
[PATCH] Add command to copy contents in a diff-mode buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>

Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 09:55:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 65380 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, juri <at> linkov.net
Subject: bug#65380: [PATCH] Add command to copy contents in a diff-mode buffer
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 16:23:09 +0000
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
>> Cc: juri <at> linkov.net,  65380 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 12:10:01 +0000
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> >>                            If the selected range extends a hunk, the
>> >> +commands attempts to look up and copy the text between from the
>> >> +referenced file.                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> >
>> > Something is missing (or redundant) in this sentence.
>> 
>> How about "the text in between from".  Does that sound better?
>>                     ^^
>
> If that's what you mean, I suggest "the text in-between the hunks".

Stole that idea :)

>> >> +By default the command will copy the text that applying the diff would
>> >> +produce, along with the text between hunks.  If REVERSE is non-nil, or
>> >> +the command was invoked with a prefix argument, copy the deleted text."
>> >
>> > The "deleted text" part here is unclear: who or what deletes text and
>> > what text is deleted?
>> 
>> I want to express that it copies the parts of the diff, that the
>> changeset removes (lines beginning with "-").  So perhaps "... copy the text
>> removed in the diff" would be better?
>
> I think "copy the text removed by the diffs", and perhaps say
> explicitly that those are the lines in the hunks preceded with "-".

According to `diff-font-lock-keywords' diff-mode also supports the "<"
syntax for removed parts of a hunk (I believe this comes from RCS?).
Then again, I would assume that the structure and contents of a diff
should be familiar to anyone using diff-mode seriously enough to be
interested in a command like this one?

-- 
	Philip Kaludercic on peregrine




This bug report was last modified 273 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.