GNU bug report logs - #65362
[PATCH] 29.1; Description of `cl-flet' in cl.texi

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 65362 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 65362 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
To: emacs-bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] 29.1; Description of `cl-flet' in cl.texi
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 12:23:58 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi all,

cl.texi doesn't mention the alternative form of bindings inside
`cl-flet' whereas the docstring does it.  I suggest the change attached
against the emacs-29 branch.

Best, Arash

[0001-Improve-the-documentation-of-cl-flet.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 65362-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 65362-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65362: [PATCH] 29.1; Description of `cl-flet' in cl.texi
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 11:51:48 +0300

> From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 12:23:58 +0200
> 
> cl.texi doesn't mention the alternative form of bindings inside
> `cl-flet' whereas the docstring does it.  I suggest the change attached
> against the emacs-29 branch.

Thanks, I installed on the emacs-29 branch a slightly different
change, and I'm therefore closing this bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.