GNU bug report logs - #65352
Fix time-machine and network

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 14:08:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #26 received at 65352 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 65352 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#65352: Fix time-machine and network
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 11:58:07 -0400
Hi,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> * guix/scripts/pull.scm (channel-list): Remove commit pair reference
>>> specification.
>>> ---
>>>  guix/scripts/pull.scm | 3 +--
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/guix/scripts/pull.scm b/guix/scripts/pull.scm
>>> index 9b78d4b5ca..616926ee0b 100644
>>> --- a/guix/scripts/pull.scm
>>> +++ b/guix/scripts/pull.scm
>>> @@ -774,8 +774,7 @@ (define (channel-list opts)
>>>                 (if (guix-channel? c)
>>>                     (let ((url (or url (channel-url c))))
>>>                       (match ref
>>> -                       ((or ('commit . commit)
>>> -                            ('tag-or-commit . commit))
>>> +                       (('tag-or-commit . commit)
>>>                          (channel (inherit c)
>>>                                   (url url) (commit commit) (branch #f)))
>>>                         (('branch . branch)
>>
>> Not that channel-list is a public API, so this is effectively changing
>> the contract, no?
>
> Yes, but it’s really meant to be used internally, where it’s either
> 'tag-or-commit or 'branch in practice.  So to me either way is fine.

In this case, should we stop exporting it from the module?  (and use it
via the (@ (...)) trick as needed).  This would communicate the
intention best.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 242 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.