GNU bug report logs -
#65352
Fix time-machine and network
Previous Next
Full log
Message #106 received at 65352 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 at 13:41, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> So all the refs such as commit(ish) or tags would be referenced locally,
> and branches such as 'master' would still trigger an update.
That’s the intent of this patch:
[bug#65352] [PATCH v2] DRAFT git: Avoid touching the network unless needed in 'reference-available?'.
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Wed, 06 Sep 2023 16:17:08 +0200
id:32d3fb5066e0b20e200dabef0fba897634e21dda.1694009405.git.zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com
https://issues.guix.gnu.org//65352
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/32d3fb5066e0b20e200dabef0fba897634e21dda.1694009405.git.zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com
https://yhetil.org/guix/32d3fb5066e0b20e200dabef0fba897634e21dda.1694009405.git.zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com
> LGTM, but I'd be curious to hear what Ludovic thinks, since their
> original code treated tags as mutable (which they technically are, but I
> agree to the value of treating them as immutable, and it appears low
> risk to me).
Do we have an use-case where tags are mutable?
To my knowledge, the Guix remote tags have always been immutable. Do we
have one counter-example?
Well, here an attempt for a scenario with mutable tags – although I
think that’s a corner case considering the current state for
manipulating Guix cache checkouts. I am using Guix 6113e05, nothing
about the patch I am proposing. :-)
$ cp -r ~/.cache/guix/checkouts/pjmkglp4t7znuugeurpurzikxq3tnlaywmisyr27shj7apsnalwq /tmp/guix,git
$ guix time-machine -q --commit=4a027d2 --url=/tmp/guix.git -- describe
So far, so good. Let add one tag.
$ git -C /tmp/guix.git tag -a mutable -m "some tag" 4a027d2
$ git -C /tmp/guix.git tag -l mut*
And…
$ guix time-machine -q --commit=mutable --url=/tmp/guix.git -- describe
guix time-machine: error: Git error: reference 'refs/tags/mutable' not found
…bang!
Well, the basic Git tags does not seem supported by the Guile-Git
’remote-fetch’ procedure. I have not investigated more. Maybe I am
missing something.
My opinion is to stay focused on the current real annoyances first and
not try to fix another hypothetical use-case which seems already buggy.
Ludo, WDYT about the proposed patch? Does it work for your use-cases?
Cheers,
simon
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 242 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.