GNU bug report logs - #65350
Request for merging "qt-updates" branch

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 65350 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 65350 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Request for merging "qt-updates" branch
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:49:02 -0400

Hello,

It's all in the title :-).

I believe the branch is ready, though we'll want to look at the QA stats
after it's done building it, just to make sure.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #8 received at 65350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 65350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65350: Request for merging "qt-updates" branch
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 19:53:41 +0800

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> It's all in the title :-).
>
> I believe the branch is ready, though we'll want to look at the QA stats
> after it's done building it, just to make sure.

There are some failures on CI with "cannot build missing derivation
...", eg:  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1830064/details

No idea how to handle that.


Also I think the kde-updates branch is ready to be merged too, which
should we merge first?

Thanks.

Message #11 received at 65350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
Cc: 65350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65350: Request for merging "qt-updates" branch
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:48:29 -0400

Hi,

宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It's all in the title :-).
>>
>> I believe the branch is ready, though we'll want to look at the QA stats
>> after it's done building it, just to make sure.
>
> There are some failures on CI with "cannot build missing derivation
> ...", eg:  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1830064/details

Yeah, these are really annoying.  I researched a bit past effort trying
to understand what's going on, and it seems to be related to baking NARs
and the connection timing out when it's too long, or similar.  The
corresponding bug report is https://issues.guix.gnu.org/54447, and some
debugging effort was documented in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50040.

[...]

> Also I think the kde-updates branch is ready to be merged too, which
> should we merge first?

No matter how we merge, the number of rebuilds will be the same, so I
suggest you go ahead.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #14 received at 65350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
Cc: 65350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65350: Request for merging "qt-updates" branch
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:50:29 -0400

Hi again,

宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It's all in the title :-).
>>
>> I believe the branch is ready, though we'll want to look at the QA stats
>> after it's done building it, just to make sure.
>
> There are some failures on CI with "cannot build missing derivation
> ...", eg:  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1830064/details

I forgot to mention, if you don't have that already and would like to
have a user TLS certificate giving you admin powers to restart builds or
configure branches on Berlin, I can generate one.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #17 received at 65350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 65350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, guix-sysadmin <at> gnu.org, iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org
Subject: Re: bug#65350: Request for merging "qt-updates" branch
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 05:16:17 +0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:

> [...]
>
>> Also I think the kde-updates branch is ready to be merged too, which
>> should we merge first?
>
> No matter how we merge, the number of rebuilds will be the same, so I
> suggest you go ahead.

Done!


> I forgot to mention, if you don't have that already and would like to
> have a user TLS certificate giving you admin powers to restart builds or
> configure branches on Berlin, I can generate one.

Yes, that would be great!  (I sent an email to guix-sysadmin asked for
it some time ago)

I think you can sent it encrypted via my GPG key on savannah, TIA!

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.