GNU bug report logs - #65348
INITIAL-INPUT in completing-read repeats same entry twice consecutively

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Heime <heimeborgia <at> protonmail.com>

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:48:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #117 received at 65348 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: heimeborgia <at> protonmail.com, 65348 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [External] : Re: bug#65348: INITIAL-INPUT in completing-read
 repeats same entry twice consecutively
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 22:19:52 +0300
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> CC: "65348 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <65348 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 16:20:07 +0000
> 
> > You can try starting a discussion on emacs-devel if you want.  But the
> > above-mentioned change was not done arbitrarily, and does have its
> > merit in many situations,
> 
> I don't see that it has merit in any situation.

The situations where it's useful are obvious.

> I haven't seen a single example cited where it
> has merit.  Can you point to one?

What for? so you could argue endlessly that you disagree?  We already
know that you don't like that change and think it should be reverted,
so what would be the purpose of another discussion about that?

> And I think you agreed that it's obvious that in
> some cases (such as the `C-h v' example cited in
> bug #64656) it's _clearly_ not helpful but harmful.

In some, quite extreme, case, indeed, it is not useful.  That doesn't
yet mean it is always useless.

Again, we've been through that, and I really have no reason to do it
again.  Life is too short.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 276 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.