GNU bug report logs - #65344
28.2; Unable to Edebug cl-flet form which uses argument destructuring

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Brandon Irizarry <brandon.irizarry <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 18:23:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 28.2

Fixed in version 30.1

Done: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #142 received at 65344 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com>
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
Cc: brandon.irizarry <at> gmail.com,
 Mattias Engdegård <mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com>,
 Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>, 65344 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65344: 28.2; Unable to Edebug cl-flet form which uses
 argument destructuring
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 08:19:29 +0200
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de> writes:

> Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Difficult.
>>
>> One could of course try filtering out constructs that def-form doesn't
>> like with a preceeding &not, but that's such an effing solution that my
>> arm hairs stand up.  I don't think I'll do that.
>
> Looks like a bad design choice made very early in the development of
> Edebug.  Maybe the developers just didn't expect that this would be used
> inside an &or alternative.

The docs say

   Edebug specifications provide the power of regular expression
   matching, plus some context-free grammar constructs:

I have a hard time imagining that somone with that spiration overlooks
something like what we have here.

I'll submit a new issue for this.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 261 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.