GNU bug report logs - #65303
emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Eric Gillespie <brickviking <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 04:23:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eric Gillespie <brickviking <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:28:20 +1200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I've found an inconsistency in the Introduction to eshell.texi. It
specifies as part of
a search pattern for Word Document files that are 100k or larger and six
months or older the following footnoted pattern:

ls -lt **/*.doc(Lk+50aM+5)

That nets me files bigger than 50k, not the 100k specified in the
paragraph. Here's
a quick diff supplying a correction.

===== diff =====
diff --git a/doc/misc/eshell.texi b/doc/misc/eshell.texi
index b5311e63a56..26f282de69c 100644
--- a/doc/misc/eshell.texi
+++ b/doc/misc/eshell.texi
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Introduction
 Any tool you use often deserves the time spent learning to master it.
 @footnote{For the understandably curious, here is what that command
 looks like: But don't let it fool you; once you know what's going on,
-it's easier than it looks: @code{ls -lt **/*.doc(Lk+50aM+5)}.}
+it's easier than it looks: @code{ls -lt **/*.doc(Lk+100aM+5)}.}

 @menu
 * Contributors to Eshell::      People who have helped out!
===== end diff =====

Regards, brickviking
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 283 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.