GNU bug report logs - #65303
emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Eric Gillespie <brickviking <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 04:23:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eric Gillespie <brickviking <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#65303: closed (Re: bug#65303: emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in
 eshell.texi Introduction)
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 05:19:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#65303: emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 65303 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
65303: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65303
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
To: Eric Gillespie <brickviking <at> gmail.com>, 65303-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65303: emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi
 Introduction
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 22:18:43 -0700
On 8/15/2023 10:13 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
> Fixed in 21b2ecee661 on the release branch, and closing this bug.

Scratch that. *Now* this bug is closed.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Eric Gillespie <brickviking <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:28:20 +1200
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
I've found an inconsistency in the Introduction to eshell.texi. It
specifies as part of
a search pattern for Word Document files that are 100k or larger and six
months or older the following footnoted pattern:

ls -lt **/*.doc(Lk+50aM+5)

That nets me files bigger than 50k, not the 100k specified in the
paragraph. Here's
a quick diff supplying a correction.

===== diff =====
diff --git a/doc/misc/eshell.texi b/doc/misc/eshell.texi
index b5311e63a56..26f282de69c 100644
--- a/doc/misc/eshell.texi
+++ b/doc/misc/eshell.texi
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Introduction
 Any tool you use often deserves the time spent learning to master it.
 @footnote{For the understandably curious, here is what that command
 looks like: But don't let it fool you; once you know what's going on,
-it's easier than it looks: @code{ls -lt **/*.doc(Lk+50aM+5)}.}
+it's easier than it looks: @code{ls -lt **/*.doc(Lk+100aM+5)}.}

 @menu
 * Contributors to Eshell::      People who have helped out!
===== end diff =====

Regards, brickviking
[Message part 5 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 283 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.