GNU bug report logs - #6528
24.0.50; `read-buffer' doc string

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#6528: closed (24.0.50; `read-buffer' doc string)
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:59:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:57:49 +0200
with message-id <AANLkTik2+0PoHAgX60nCEfaputssnTjTtz+C1zmjv=js <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#6528: 24.0.50; `read-buffer' doc string
has caused the GNU bug report #6528,
regarding 24.0.50; `read-buffer' doc string
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
6528: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6528
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 24.0.50; `read-buffer' doc string
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:40:19 -0700

The doc string says:
 
 Optional third arg REQUIRE-MATCH determines whether non-existing
 buffer names are allowed.  It has the same meaning as the
 REQUIRE-MATCH argument of `confirm-after-completion'.
 
The last sentence is incorrect (meaningless): `confirm-after-completion'
is not a function, and it has no arguments.
 

In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2010-06-21 on 3249CTO
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/xpm/include'
 

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph <cschol2112 <at> googlemail.com>, 6528-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#6528: 24.0.50; `read-buffer' doc string
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:57:49 +0200

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:28, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> wrote:

> I imagine that's right. Hopefully someone who knows will confirm. Thx.

It seems obviously correct, so I've committed it to emacs-23.

    Juanma

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.