GNU bug report logs - #65250
30.0.50; "C-h f" is much slower on the master branch

Previous Next

Full log

Message #29 received at 65250 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 65250 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65250: 30.0.50; "C-h f" is much slower on the master branch
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:19:41 -0400

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>
>> Cc: 65250 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:51:46 -0400
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> > So I think the patch I presented in my original report is exactly what
>> > is needed here: the problem only happens in builds without
>> > native-compilation, and in that case there's no reason whatsoever to
>> > call comp-function-type-spec.  (And builds from a release tarball will
>> > not see that problem, since the tarball comes with byte-compiled
>> > comp.el and comp-cstr.el.)
>> >
>> > Do you agree?
>> 
>> I certainly do.  Thanks for the anylysis and the patch!
>
> Installed.
>
> Btw, why aren't comp.el and comp-cstr.el byte-compiled in a build
> without native-compilation?  That's probably a bug in itself: we
> generally byte-compile all the *.el files, even those that are not
> relevant to the configuration being built.

That's a good question, I'll have a look probably tomorrow.

Thanks

  Andrea

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.