GNU bug report logs - #65116
29.1; query-replace-read-args fails reading second arg in detached minibuf

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
Cc: jim <at> rees.org, 65116 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65116: 29.1; query-replace-read-args fails reading second arg in detached minibuf
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 13:47:32 +0000

Hello again, Eli and Po.

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 09:23:26 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 08:34:28 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 21:44:11 +0000
> > > Cc: 65116 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, acm <at> muc.de
> > > From: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>

> > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:57:42 -0600, Jim Rees wrote:
> > > > Well that's a relief. I do have an unusual setup with detached minibuf and
> > > > focus follows mouse. There has been a lot of churn in replace.el and frame.c
> > > > lately and I keep hoping the bug will go away on its own. I don't really
> > > > understand all the focus changes in the code but I do see why they are
> > > > necessary.

> > > > I have a workaround, I have bound this to a key and use it to re-focus to
> > > > the minibuf so I can enter the 'to' text:

> > > > (select-frame-set-input-focus (window-frame (minibuffer-window)))

> > > > But that requires manual intervention so for now I'm sticking with 28.1.

> > > I've been playing with the setup for an hour or two.  It seems that
> > > performing some action in the minibuffer (say, M-x auto-revert-mode, but
> > > anything will do) causes M-% to work properly.  But then, the moment the
> > > mouse leaves the active frame or window (I'm not sure which), M-% no
> > > longer works properly, until the next minibuffer action.

> > > I know this isn't much help to you, but it should be a help to us,
> > > tracking down what's going wrong.

> > If this is WM-specific, maybe Po Lu (CC'ed) could help us understand
> > what happens here?  Perhaps some message we expect from X is not being
> > received in this scenario?

> I've got some more info which might be useful.  There are two calls to
> read_minibuf (the lowest level of minibuffer access in src/minibuf.c)
> during the query-replace processing.

> during the first access, the focus gets redirected to the minibuffer at
> L812 of minibuf.c, with

>   if (!EQ (mini_frame, selected_frame))
>       Fredirect_frame_focus (selected_frame, mini_frame);

> ..  [I don't know what undoes this focus redirection later.]  After the
> recursive edit, provided it wasn't aborted with C-g, the code moves the
> focus back to the main frame with, at L963,

>     call2 (Qselect_frame_set_input_focus, calling_frame, Qnil);

> ..  In the bug scenario, if this statement at L963 is commented out, the
> bug symptoms are no longer evident.

> So it seems something in the second read_minibuf call is preventing the
> Fredirect_frame_focus at L812 from working.

No, that is not the case.

> We can hardly avoid needing to use GDB, here.

I've done some GDBing, and what is happening in the bug case is that the
window manager, twm, is sending a focus-in event to Emacs when we start
trying to read characters.  This focus-in event switches the current
frame away from the minibuffer's frame to the main frame.

I don't know why this is happening, or why omitting the
select-frame-set-input-focus at the end of the first read_minibuf call
causes us to be spared this focus-in event on the second read_minibuf
call.

It is not clear whether the bug is in the Emacs master (with which I've
been testing) or twm.

Help from somebody more experienced with X-Windows would be welcome.

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


> -- 
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.