GNU bug report logs -
#65113
Emacs-29 and master csharp-mode with broken treesit
Previous Next
Reported by: J M <jean <at> tbm.email>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 15:05:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 65113 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 65113 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65113
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 06 Aug 2023 15:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
J M <jean <at> tbm.email>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 06 Aug 2023 15:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi all
Treesit is broken for csharp-mode in the latest version in master and emacs-29 and therefore does not provide syntax highlighting. 
The latest grammar repository (https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-c-sharp) has removed the keyword void_keyword.
Please see attached the patch to resolve the issue.
Thanks
Jean M
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[treesit_void_keyword_removed_from_grammar.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65113
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 06 Aug 2023 15:37:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 65113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: J M <jean <at> tbm.email>
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 16:03:45 +0100
>
> Treesit is broken for csharp-mode in the latest version in master and emacs-29 and therefore does not provide syntax highlighting. 
>
> The latest grammar repository (https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-c-sharp) has removed the keyword void_keyword.
>
> Please see attached the patch to resolve the issue.
Thanks, but your patch will not work with the older version of the
grammar library, right? Is it possible to make a patch that will work
with both? Wed cannot rely on users having the latest grammar
versions, so a backward-compatible change is much more preferable.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65113
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 07 Aug 2023 05:47:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 65113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 6 August 2023 17:36:47 CEST, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: J M <jean <at> tbm.email>
>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 16:03:45 +0100
>>
>> Treesit is broken for csharp-mode in the latest version in master and emacs-29 and therefore does not provide syntax highlighting. 
>>
>> The latest grammar repository (https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-c-sharp) has removed the keyword void_keyword.
>>
>> Please see attached the patch to resolve the issue.
>
>Thanks, but your patch will not work with the older version of the
>grammar library, right? Is it possible to make a patch that will work
>with both? Wed cannot rely on users having the latest grammar
>versions, so a backward-compatible change is much more preferable.
We've had some similar patches lately that you can use for inspiration.
Thanks,
Theo
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65113
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:06:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 65113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 07:46:05 +0200
> From: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
> CC: 65113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Ping! Can we please have a patch that is backward-compatible?
> On 6 August 2023 17:36:47 CEST, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> >> From: J M <jean <at> tbm.email>
> >> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 16:03:45 +0100
> >>
> >> Treesit is broken for csharp-mode in the latest version in master and emacs-29 and therefore does not provide syntax highlighting. 
> >>
> >> The latest grammar repository (https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-c-sharp) has removed the keyword void_keyword.
> >>
> >> Please see attached the patch to resolve the issue.
> >
> >Thanks, but your patch will not work with the older version of the
> >grammar library, right? Is it possible to make a patch that will work
> >with both? Wed cannot rely on users having the latest grammar
> >versions, so a backward-compatible change is much more preferable.
>
> We've had some similar patches lately that you can use for inspiration.
>
> Thanks,
> Theo
>
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65113
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 10 Aug 2023 22:43:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 65113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Eli
See attached the requested backward-compatible change.
[0001-Update-csharp-treesit-support-due-to-upstream-change.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
> On 10 Aug 2023, at 10:05, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 07:46:05 +0200
>> From: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
>> CC: 65113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Ping! Can we please have a patch that is backward-compatible?
>
>> On 6 August 2023 17:36:47 CEST, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>>>> From: J M <jean <at> tbm.email>
>>>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 16:03:45 +0100
>>>>
>>>> Treesit is broken for csharp-mode in the latest version in master and emacs-29 and therefore does not provide syntax highlighting. 
>>>>
>>>> The latest grammar repository (https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-c-sharp) has removed the keyword void_keyword.
>>>>
>>>> Please see attached the patch to resolve the issue.
>>>
>>> Thanks, but your patch will not work with the older version of the
>>> grammar library, right? Is it possible to make a patch that will work
>>> with both? Wed cannot rely on users having the latest grammar
>>> versions, so a backward-compatible change is much more preferable.
>>
>> We've had some similar patches lately that you can use for inspiration.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Theo
>>
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#65113
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 11 Aug 2023 05:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 65113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: J M <jean <at> tbm.email>
> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 23:42:22 +0100
> Cc: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>,
> casouri <at> gmail.com,
> 65113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> See attached the requested backward-compatible change.
Thank you! Should we perhaps swap the order, and query first about
the newer type, so as to make the code a bit faster when used with the
latest grammar?
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 12 Aug 2023 07:27:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
J M <jean <at> tbm.email>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 12 Aug 2023 07:27:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 65113-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: J M <jean <at> tbm.email>
> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 23:42:22 +0100
> Cc: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>,
> casouri <at> gmail.com,
> 65113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> See attached the requested backward-compatible change.
Thanks, installed on the emacs-29 branch, and closing the bug.
Please in the future accompany your changes with a ChangeLog-style
description of files and functions where you make changes (I did it
this time for you).
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 09 Sep 2023 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 287 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.