GNU bug report logs - #65094
30.0.50; '/ u' is missing in menu bar under Package

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65094: closed (30.0.50; '/ u' is missing in menu bar under
 Package)
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 07:04:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2023 10:03:54 +0300
with message-id <83edkgr6sl.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#65094: 30.0.50; '/ u' is missing in menu bar under Package
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #65094,
regarding 30.0.50; '/ u' is missing in menu bar under Package
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
65094: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65094
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
To: emacs-bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 30.0.50; '/ u' is missing in menu bar under Package
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2023 14:14:41 +0200

Hi all,

is there a specific reason why `package-menu-filter-upgradable' bound to
'/ u' is missing in package menu under "Package -> Filter packages"?
All other filtering commands described in the manual[1] are available
there.

`package-menu-filter-upgradable' was added with commit 8c96c720fa.

Best, Arash

Footnotes:
[1]  https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Package-Menu.html

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 65094-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65094: 30.0.50; '/ u' is missing in menu bar under Package
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 10:03:54 +0300

> From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: 65094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2023 22:06:14 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Thanks, but can we make the help-echo string a bit more helpful, by
> > not just repeating what the item's name says?  What does it mean "by
> > upgradeability" -- does it mean only packages that can be upgraded
> > will be shown? if so, let's say so.
> >
> > (Yes, I know the other help-echo are also of this kind, but that
> > doesn't mean they are a good example to follow...)
> 
> My choice was driven solely by symmetry to the other entries.  Maybe
> something like this:

Thanks, installed.  But what I had in mind is the kind of changes I
made in the followup commit, please take a look.

Closing the bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.