GNU bug report logs -
#65035
29.1; Port flycheck-emacs-lisp-initialize-packages to flymake
Previous Next
Full log
Message #35 received at 65035 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ping! Can we make some progress with this bug report?
> Cc: joaotavora <at> gmail.com, 65035 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Pengji Zhang <me <at> pengjiz.com>
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 19:18:20 +0800
>
> Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com> writes:
>
> > I think this should also switch from passing "-Q" to passing just
> > "-q". If we're include ~/.emacs.d/elpa on load-path, we should include
> > the site-lisp directories too, which -Q suppresses.
>
> I agree. How about the following change?
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> :name "elisp-flymake-byte-compile"
> :buffer output-buffer
> :command `(,(expand-file-name invocation-name invocation-directory)
> - "-Q"
> + ,@(if elisp-flymake--byte-compile-activate-packages
> + ;; Add site-lisp directories to `load-path' so
> + ;; that system-wide packages (installed into
> + ;; site-lisp/elpa) are activated.
> + '("-q" "--no-site-file")
> + '("-Q"))
> "--batch"
> ;; "--eval" "(setq load-prefer-newer t)" ; for testing
> ,@(mapcan (lambda (path) (list "-L" path))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> > Probably we should specifically pass "--batch --no-site-file" instead
> > of "-Q --batch", since --batch also implies -q.
>
> I am not sure if it is a good idea to always include the site-lisp
> directories. I myself want this only when checking my init.el. When
> developing packages, I prefer a pristine environment.
>
>
>
>
This bug report was last modified 169 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.