GNU bug report logs - #65027
30.0.50; [PATCH] Document .elpaignore behavior in the Emacs Lisp manual

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 04:57:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #108 received at 65027-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: Protesilaos Stavrou <prot <at> protesilaos.com>
Cc: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>, philipk <at> posteo.net,
 65027-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, corwin <at> bru.st,
 Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#65027: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Document .elpaignore behavior in the
 Emacs Lisp manual
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 16:48:52 +0000
Protesilaos Stavrou <prot <at> protesilaos.com> writes:

> On 2025-02-13 10:05, Stefan Kangas wrote:
>> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Protesilaos Stavrou <info <at> protesilaos.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Sorry for the delay!  I read the entire thread.  I am willing to
>>>> contribute towards the creation of a new manual.  As Stefan Monnier
>>>> noted earlier,[1] I think it is better to have it be about "Emacs
>>>> packages" with relevant subsections for where those are stored and
>>>> how
>>>> they can be installed.
>>>>
>>>> How do we start?  Perhaps someone can produce a draft to get things
>>>> going?  I am happy to volunteer towards that end.
>>>
>>> Sounds like a plan.  Thanks for working on this.
>>>
>>>> Should this be in .texi or can we do it in .org format?
>>>
>>> We generally prefer .texi, but either way is fine for a first draft.
>>> It's not crucial at this stage, and we can always convert it to
>>> another
>>> format later.  The biggest work is in writing it.
>>
>> Protesilaos, did you make any progress here?
>
> No, I did not do anything. This was last year and I started dealing with
> RSI shortly afterwards. Things are better now, but I cannot make the
> commitment
> anymore.

I hope that you will start to feel better.

For now, I see that the proposed patch in this bug report has been
handled, so I'm closing this bug.  If anyone else wants to step forward
to write a packaging manual, please do, and thanks in advance.




This bug report was last modified 151 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.