GNU bug report logs - #65027
30.0.50; [PATCH] Document .elpaignore behavior in the Emacs Lisp manual

Previous Next

Full log

Message #103 received at 65027 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Protesilaos Stavrou <prot <at> protesilaos.com>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>,
 Protesilaos Stavrou <info <at> protesilaos.com>, 65027 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 philipk <at> posteo.net, corwin <at> bru.st, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>,
 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#65027: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Document .elpaignore behavior in the
 Emacs Lisp manual
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 18:08:33 +0200

On 2025-02-13 10:05, Stefan Kangas wrote:
> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Protesilaos Stavrou <info <at> protesilaos.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Sorry for the delay!  I read the entire thread.  I am willing to
>>> contribute towards the creation of a new manual.  As Stefan Monnier
>>> noted earlier,[1] I think it is better to have it be about "Emacs
>>> packages" with relevant subsections for where those are stored and 
>>> how
>>> they can be installed.
>>> 
>>> How do we start?  Perhaps someone can produce a draft to get things
>>> going?  I am happy to volunteer towards that end.
>> 
>> Sounds like a plan.  Thanks for working on this.
>> 
>>> Should this be in .texi or can we do it in .org format?
>> 
>> We generally prefer .texi, but either way is fine for a first draft.
>> It's not crucial at this stage, and we can always convert it to 
>> another
>> format later.  The biggest work is in writing it.
> 
> Protesilaos, did you make any progress here?

No, I did not do anything. This was last year and I started dealing with
RSI shortly afterwards. Things are better now, but I cannot make the 
commitment
anymore.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.