From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:08:08 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#6501 <6501@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#6501 <6501@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.0.50; Unify finder keyword usage -- emulation/emulations Reply-To: bug#6501 <6501@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:08:08 +0000 retitle 6501 24.0.50; Unify finder keyword usage -- emulation/emulations reassign 6501 emacs submitter 6501 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec severity 6501 minor thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 24 05:05:21 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2010 09:05:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORiN6-0000b3-RT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:05:21 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORiN2-0000ay-Pc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:05:18 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:48418) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ORiMz-0007Hp-EX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:05:13 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58376 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ORiMx-0002mY-IM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:05:12 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORiMt-0007sF-Ow for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:05:11 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:58746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORiMt-0007s0-JH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:05:07 -0400 Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so300599fxm.0 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:05:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+u4zxee5f2bcAoG3sa3UJ9km+TI24NuXx4nJ8FgSTlI=; b=KKbAM8UOGCVdMdPbEp0LJg62ADKekslOJVfeFAvFklA920T0VfCTe9E3C9fCJjs2VA tsXdfaHhTIbaJW97ew3xeq03lVdVbxPBV/VU2oLfDeGoekWh/2AmC+fJdD/PnWlgS9Bk QYPnYDCKoILywMFeXccyeI1mD3h72btBOzzzU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Oqzn7UVIJzdys1nUOM3sW8NWdmqheV7lV5M4zDPMP+zyHuCJiwXfhuyuGDb3ASvtiA /K8Q8gh8Vlxp4Z63nj97RvhUO4SCgJ/w0fPfCc3BVXQe+VoYOW2WPAscqBPTmwKq9Fod mmj9aT/ka2plhafTperycBrrb6VTGjJSIdejQ= Received: by 10.223.77.86 with SMTP id f22mr8973228fak.49.1277370306562; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:05:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([88.103.132.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 1sm736798fax.2.2010.06.24.02.05.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:05:05 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.0.50; Unify finder keyword usage -- emulation/emulations Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:04:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87y6e4x0mf.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) There is currently both "emulation" and "emulations" occuring as finder keywords. Wouldn't it be better if only one of them were used? "Emulation" seems better to me, but "emulations" is used in majority of cases. =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 24 18:02:00 2010 Received: (at 6501) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2010 22:02:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORuUh-00004s-0O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:01:59 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.starman.ee ([85.253.0.4] helo=mx2.starman.ee) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORuUd-0008WC-PN for 6501@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:01:56 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx2.starman.ee Received: from mail.starman.ee (62.65.209.24.cable.starman.ee [62.65.209.24]) by mx2.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F253F4079; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 01:01:47 +0300 (EEST) From: Juri Linkov To: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Subject: Re: bug#6501: 24.0.50; Unify finder keyword usage -- emulation/emulations Organization: JURTA References: <87y6e4x0mf.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:57:07 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87y6e4x0mf.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsWgdMSbcMOhbiBOxJtt?= =?utf-8?B?ZWMiJ3M=?= message of "Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:04:24 +0200") Message-ID: <87mxuk9m2s.fsf@mail.jurta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6501 Cc: 6501@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) > There is currently both "emulation" and "emulations" occuring as finder > keywords. Wouldn't it be better if only one of them were used? > "Emulation" seems better to me, but "emulations" is used in majority of > cases. "emulations" is a standard keyword defined in finder-known-keywords in finder.el as "emulations of other editors" (though the subdirectory's name is "emulation"). So we could change the keyword "emulation" to "emulations" in 3 packages: * hl-line.el:: highlight the current line. * cua-base.el:: emulate CUA key bindings. * pc-select.el:: emulate mark, cut, copy and paste from Motif. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 25 08:00:03 2010 Received: (at 6501) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2010 12:00:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OS7Zj-00087g-FY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:00:03 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OS7Zg-00087D-ON for 6501@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:00:01 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so141468fga.15 for <6501@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:59:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=HcXw5bOuxNsIeaZH0U5/GK3+ZxiYAjIGpRgqAsyFvN8=; b=gPFDZpv1G1u35Yp+Bqknypfa/YFF4J0ACt9RpqSHC78zBt6igIBZNzHDHfv9Ye/eMB wKk7Tjna3nvekpmWvdelOMH/sbVaa2MY+PKSW3xYgvBYnc+TLYG/RiWMaWgECvFTx3Vc P6eabBsJ/YzVQ7vN1SqKYK3Mxzm4OwRxCLOrQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=LiJzXU2vTt71lM+P82NRDaPXfAH72B6tBOTbQ8zBkOIcGfPQmr53mYPegxOhEjPuOV ELh85ru6LgdwTFyvH+VXd0PjIE1aMYhV0NNTN8be+N5HgjWYBLkKM3KvMFrP0qcV/Ayn UcC1J0hdD05O8+T3bK4TX/25n7PRblQUdDvmo= Received: by 10.87.35.20 with SMTP id n20mr999448fgj.0.1277467194927; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:59:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([88.103.132.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm152547fks.22.2010.06.25.04.59.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:59:50 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= To: Juri Linkov Subject: Re: bug#6501: 24.0.50; Unify finder keyword usage -- emulation/emulations In-Reply-To: <87mxuk9m2s.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:57:07 +0300") References: <87y6e4x0mf.fsf@gmail.com> <87mxuk9m2s.fsf@mail.jurta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:59:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87hbkrwcfm.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6501 Cc: 6501@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Juri Linkov writes: >> There is currently both "emulation" and "emulations" occuring as finder >> keywords. Wouldn't it be better if only one of them were used? >> "Emulation" seems better to me, but "emulations" is used in majority of >> cases. > > "emulations" is a standard keyword defined in finder-known-keywords > in finder.el as "emulations of other editors" (though the subdirectory's > name is "emulation"). So we could change the keyword "emulation" > to "emulations" in 3 packages: > > * hl-line.el:: highlight the current line. > * cua-base.el:: emulate CUA key bindings. > * pc-select.el:: emulate mark, cut, copy and paste from Motif. Yes. Or we could change the existing "emulations" to "emulation"... That's why I didn't come up with a patch -- I would prefer "emulation", but have no idea what success I'm going to have with such a proposal. I can certainly live with "emulations" as well; let's just unify it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 25 16:56:18 2010 Received: (at 6501) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2010 20:56:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSFwf-0003Ic-Ub for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:56:18 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.starman.ee ([85.253.0.4] helo=mx2.starman.ee) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSFwd-0003IC-JU for 6501@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:56:15 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx2.starman.ee Received: from mail.starman.ee (62.65.210.19.cable.starman.ee [62.65.210.19]) by mx2.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F1F3F40A6; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:56:05 +0300 (EEST) From: Juri Linkov To: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Subject: Re: bug#6501: 24.0.50; Unify finder keyword usage -- emulation/emulations Organization: JURTA References: <87y6e4x0mf.fsf@gmail.com> <87mxuk9m2s.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87hbkrwcfm.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:37:44 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87hbkrwcfm.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsWgdMSbcMOhbiBOxJtt?= =?utf-8?B?ZWMiJ3M=?= message of "Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:59:09 +0200") Message-ID: <87vd96kff3.fsf@mail.jurta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6501 Cc: 6501@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) > Yes. Or we could change the existing "emulations" to "emulation"... > That's why I didn't come up with a patch -- I would prefer "emulation", > but have no idea what success I'm going to have with such a proposal. > I can certainly live with "emulations" as well; let's just unify it. Hmm, really it would be better to unify the keyword and the subdirectory. But renaming the subdirectory would be much more trouble than renaming keywords in 20 files. So perhaps you are right that the keyword "emulations" should be renamed to "emulation". -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 26 17:03:02 2010 Received: (at 6501-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2010 21:03:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OScWk-0005bO-1i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:03:02 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OScWi-0005bF-Ho for 6501-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:03:00 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OScWd-0003rh-AK; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:02:55 -0400 To: 6501-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#6501: 24.0.50; Unify finder keyword usage -- emulation/emulations References: <87y6e4x0mf.fsf@gmail.com> From: Glenn Morris X-Spook: Yukon lynch Merlin military Bin Laden basement Gazprom X-Ran: [Sqn@@D[*-#%#i+#%7*jjh]Ol[wL1GS$~PASG<_kF=):!V,.t6xC&EI4Z/;}+o/B[:@t;, X-Hue: blue X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:02:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4nlja11p8g.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6501-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) > There is currently both "emulation" and "emulations" occuring as finder > keywords. Wouldn't it be better if only one of them were used? > "Emulation" seems better to me, but "emulations" is used in majority of > cases. "emulations" is what is specified in finder-known-keywords, so I corrected the 3 files using "emulation". From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 30 20:03:10 2010 Received: (at 6501) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2010 00:03:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU7FG-00057W-N0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:03:10 -0400 Received: from smtp-02.vtx.ch ([194.38.175.91]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU7FE-00057R-Rn for 6501@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:03:09 -0400 Received: from ceviche.home (dyn.144-85-133-055.dsl.vtx.ch [144.85.133.55]) by smtp-02.vtx.ch (VTX Services SA) with ESMTP id ED2AD5FC3C; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 02:03:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C3C09660F4; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 02:03:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan Monnier To: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Subject: Re: bug#6501: 24.0.50; Unify finder keyword usage -- emulation/emulations Message-ID: References: <87y6e4x0mf.fsf@gmail.com> <87mxuk9m2s.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87hbkrwcfm.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 02:03:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87hbkrwcfm.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsWgdMSbcMOhbiBOxJtt?= =?utf-8?B?ZWMiJ3M=?= message of "Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:59:09 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6501 Cc: Juri Linkov , 6501@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) > Yes. Or we could change the existing "emulations" to "emulation"... > That's why I didn't come up with a patch -- I would prefer "emulation", > but have no idea what success I'm going to have with such a proposal. > I can certainly live with "emulations" as well; let's just unify it. I don't care much either way, but as for taste "emulation" seems to make more sense than "emulations". Stefan From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:08:08 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator