GNU bug report logs -
#6501
24.0.50; Unify finder keyword usage -- emulation/emulations
Previous Next
Reported by: Štěpán Němec <stepnem <at> gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:06:01 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in version 24.0.50
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 6501 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 6501 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#6501
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:06:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Štěpán Němec <stepnem <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
There is currently both "emulation" and "emulations" occuring as finder
keywords. Wouldn't it be better if only one of them were used?
"Emulation" seems better to me, but "emulations" is used in majority of
cases.
Štěpán
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#6501
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:02:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 6501 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> There is currently both "emulation" and "emulations" occuring as finder
> keywords. Wouldn't it be better if only one of them were used?
> "Emulation" seems better to me, but "emulations" is used in majority of
> cases.
"emulations" is a standard keyword defined in finder-known-keywords
in finder.el as "emulations of other editors" (though the subdirectory's
name is "emulation"). So we could change the keyword "emulation"
to "emulations" in 3 packages:
* hl-line.el:: highlight the current line.
* cua-base.el:: emulate CUA key bindings.
* pc-select.el:: emulate mark, cut, copy and paste from Motif.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#6501
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 6501 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org> writes:
>> There is currently both "emulation" and "emulations" occuring as finder
>> keywords. Wouldn't it be better if only one of them were used?
>> "Emulation" seems better to me, but "emulations" is used in majority of
>> cases.
>
> "emulations" is a standard keyword defined in finder-known-keywords
> in finder.el as "emulations of other editors" (though the subdirectory's
> name is "emulation"). So we could change the keyword "emulation"
> to "emulations" in 3 packages:
>
> * hl-line.el:: highlight the current line.
> * cua-base.el:: emulate CUA key bindings.
> * pc-select.el:: emulate mark, cut, copy and paste from Motif.
Yes. Or we could change the existing "emulations" to "emulation"...
That's why I didn't come up with a patch -- I would prefer "emulation",
but have no idea what success I'm going to have with such a proposal.
I can certainly live with "emulations" as well; let's just unify it.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#6501
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:57:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 6501 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Yes. Or we could change the existing "emulations" to "emulation"...
> That's why I didn't come up with a patch -- I would prefer "emulation",
> but have no idea what success I'm going to have with such a proposal.
> I can certainly live with "emulations" as well; let's just unify it.
Hmm, really it would be better to unify the keyword and the subdirectory.
But renaming the subdirectory would be much more trouble than renaming
keywords in 20 files. So perhaps you are right that the keyword
"emulations" should be renamed to "emulation".
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
Reply sent
to
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:04:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Štěpán Němec <stepnem <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:04:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 6501-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> There is currently both "emulation" and "emulations" occuring as finder
> keywords. Wouldn't it be better if only one of them were used?
> "Emulation" seems better to me, but "emulations" is used in majority of
> cases.
"emulations" is what is specified in finder-known-keywords, so I
corrected the 3 files using "emulation".
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#6501
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 6501 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Yes. Or we could change the existing "emulations" to "emulation"...
> That's why I didn't come up with a patch -- I would prefer "emulation",
> but have no idea what success I'm going to have with such a proposal.
> I can certainly live with "emulations" as well; let's just unify it.
I don't care much either way, but as for taste "emulation" seems to make
more sense than "emulations".
Stefan
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 14 years and 327 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.