GNU bug report logs - #64985
29.1; [PATCH] Byte-compilation of packages via package-vc doesn't correctly handle .elpaignore wildcards

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 06:21:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 29.1

Done: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#64985: closed (29.1; [PATCH] Byte-compilation of packages via
 package-vc doesn't correctly handle .elpaignore wildcards)
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 18:09:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:08:17 -0700
with message-id <6e947a84-7a73-5890-8672-fe8ef7286c4f <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#64985: 29.1; [PATCH] Byte-compilation of packages via package-vc doesn't correctly handle .elpaignore wildcards
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #64985,
regarding 29.1; [PATCH] Byte-compilation of packages via package-vc doesn't correctly handle .elpaignore wildcards
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
64985: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64985
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 29.1; [PATCH] Byte-compilation of packages via package-vc doesn't
 correctly handle .elpaignore wildcards
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 23:20:21 -0700
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
When using the various package-vc installation functions, Emacs 
byte-compiles the source (good). However, it doesn't ignore sources that 
match wildcards in ".elpaignore" (bad). That's because, even though 
'byte-compile-ignore-files' is documented to be a list of regexps, 
'byte-recompile-directory' treats it as a list of strings.

To reproduce this, install a package via VC, for example via M-x 
package-vc-install RET https://github.com/jimporter/urgrep.git RET. Then 
notice how "urgrep-tests.el" got compiled, even though it matches a 
wildcard in ".elpaignore".

Patch attached to fix this. Eli, would this be safe enough for 29.2? 
'byte-compile-ignore-files' is a new feature in 29.1, so hopefully no 
one else is relying on its current semantics just yet.
[0001-Fix-handling-of-.elpaignore-file-when-compiling-pack.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Cc: Mattias EngdegÄrd <mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com>,
 64985-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#64985: 29.1; [PATCH] Byte-compilation of packages via
 package-vc doesn't correctly handle .elpaignore wildcards
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:08:17 -0700
On 8/1/2023 12:21 PM, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
> Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> How about this? For extra micro-optimization, I put the 'mapconcat'
>> call outside of the loop. Now we won't concat the same list of strings
>> for every file/dir that we look at.
> 
> I like this a lot more, thanks.

Thanks. Now merged to the release branch as da5e05a50e8. Marking this 
bug closed.



This bug report was last modified 1 year and 286 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.