GNU bug report logs -
#6497
documentation `indirect-function', `symbol-function' do not enumerate return value type
Previous Next
Reported by: MON KEY <monkey <at> sandpframing.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:44:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Tags: wontfix
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #20 received at 6497 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Prob. what you meant to was:
> (progn
> (fset 'foo 3)
> (symbol-function 'foo))
Indeed, although it's a trivial mistake. The example works just as
well when the value of foo is a symbol, which it must have been at the
time I tried it.
> <examples of unintern doing funny things>
Unintern does funny things. Those funny things are not relevant to
this bug report.
> The distinction between value cell and
> function cell confirms a reliance on the details of function
> representation.
What a bizarre claim. The number of slots in a symbol has nothing to
do with the representation of functions. Why would it?
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 319 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.