From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 22 13:29:58 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2010 17:29:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR7IL-0001JB-Th for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:29:58 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR7IK-0001J5-4v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:29:56 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:58925) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OR7IF-0003Tm-K7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:29:51 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53180 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OR7IE-0001SW-77 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:29:51 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR7ID-0007Lp-4N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:29:50 -0400 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:19931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR7IC-0007LZ-T5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:29:49 -0400 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id o5MHTjfC017661 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:29:47 GMT Received: from acsmt354.oracle.com (acsmt354.oracle.com [141.146.40.154]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id o5ME2Fuk010925 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:29:42 GMT Received: from abhmt019.oracle.com by acsmt353.oracle.com with ESMTP id 347659241277227774; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:29:34 -0700 Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.160.27) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:29:32 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: Subject: 24.0.50; doc string of `eval-expression' Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:29:31 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcsSMHmfjLxz2sufRO6+z6S71fXUSA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-Source-IP: rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090203.4C20F30B.0102:SCFMA4539811,ss=1,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) The doc strings says nothing about the command reading an expression input by the user - which is the most important info for users. This is a _command_, not just a non-interactive function. Its behavior for users needs to be described. In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2010-06-21 on 3249CTO Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/xpm/include' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 13 19:36:21 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2011 23:36:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh8ya-0008LG-Rd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:36:21 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh8yZ-0008L1-6p for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:36:19 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=quimbies.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh8yO-0007DQ-8X for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:36:08 +0200 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:36:07 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #6495 X-MailScanner-ID: 1Qh8yO-0007DQ-8X X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1311204968.37182@YO6eenwjWuHz6WUugM2U9w X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) tags 6495 fixed close 6495 24.1 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 13 19:51:28 2011 Received: (at 6495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2011 23:51:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh9DE-00017d-BR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:51:28 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh9D8-00016v-FR for 6495@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:51:22 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=quimbies.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh9Cv-0007SC-0e; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:51:09 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: 24.0.50; doc string of `eval-expression' In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:29:31 -0700") Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:36:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Now-Playing: Depeche Mode's _A Broken Frame_: "My Secret Garden" X-Hashcash: 1:23:110713:6495@debbugs.gnu.org::P5ehgWifyN44eT4K:000000000000000000000000000000000000000004PPW X-Hashcash: 1:23:110713:drew.adams@oracle.com::GuExIdi8fRwuPTh0:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000vh5E MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1Qh9Cv-0007SC-0e X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1311205869.69433@hbtig+xyvBksOO3eG8rC7g X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6495 Cc: 6495@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) "Drew Adams" writes: > The doc strings says nothing about the command reading an expression > input by the user - which is the most important info for users. This is > a _command_, not just a non-interactive function. Its behavior for > users needs to be described. I've now added this. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From unknown Sun Jun 22 17:18:24 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator