GNU bug report logs -
#64910
[PATCH 0/3] gnu: docker: Update to 20.10.25.
Previous Next
Reported by: Hilton Chain <hako <at> ultrarare.space>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 03:13:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Hilton Chain <hako <at> ultrarare.space>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Tue, 29 Aug 2023 23:16:39 +0800
with message-id <87msy92814.wl-hako <at> ultrarare.space>
and subject line Re: [bug#64910] [PATCH v2 0/3] gnu: docker: Update to 20.10.25.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #64910,
regarding [PATCH 0/3] gnu: docker: Update to 20.10.25.
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
64910: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64910
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello Guix!
This patchset updates docker & docker-cil to 20.10.25, runc to latest version,
and containerd to latest 1.6 version.
It's only a patch version update and I haven't looked into the major version
update.
Thanks
Hilton Chain (3):
gnu: runc: Update to 1.1.8.
gnu: containerd: Update to 1.6.22.
gnu: docker: Update to 20.10.25.
gnu/packages/docker.scm | 18 +++++++++---------
gnu/packages/virtualization.scm | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
base-commit: 35c8d631d2bd63c64e863b5509f29fdcb7f856e6
--
2.41.0
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 01:57:43 +0800,
Christopher Baines wrote:
>
> [1 <text/plain (7bit)>]
>
> Hilton Chain via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Hilton Chain (3):
> > gnu: runc: Update to 1.1.9.
> > gnu: containerd: Update to 1.6.22.
> > gnu: docker: Update to 20.10.25.
> >
> > gnu/packages/docker.scm | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
> > gnu/packages/virtualization.scm | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> I haven't tried this out, but it seems like QA [1] is OK with the
> changes. There are some red bits, but I think that's just some blocked
> builds being counted as unknown.
Thanks for taking a look! I have checked it again and pushed it to
master.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 267 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.