GNU bug report logs - #64905
[PATCH 00/10] Update tree-sitter{, -{c{, pp, -sharp}, go, java, {java, type}script, python}},

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Hilton Chain <hako <at> ultrarare.space>

Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:50:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Andrew Tropin <andrew <at> trop.in>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #149 received at 64905 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Hilton Chain <hako <at> ultrarare.space>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: 64905 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#64905] [PATCH v4 02/11] gnu: tree-sitter: Update to 0.20.10.
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:49:45 +0800
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 18:40:15 +0800,
Christopher Baines wrote:
>
> [1  <text/plain (quoted-printable)>]
>
> Hilton Chain via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> > * gnu/packages/tree-sitter.scm (tree-sitter): Update to 0.20.10.
> > (tree-sitter-cli)[arguments]<#:cargo-test-flags>: Skip github_issue_test.
> > <#:cargo-inputs>: Add rust-path-slash-0.2.
> > ---
> >  gnu/packages/tree-sitter.scm | 12 ++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/tree-sitter.scm b/gnu/packages/tree-sitter.scm
> > index 117c2acb0c..ffed09d945 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/tree-sitter.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/tree-sitter.scm
> > @@ -94,18 +94,20 @@ (define-public python-tree-sitter
> >      (license license:expat)))
> >
> >  (define-public tree-sitter
> > +  ;; Untagged
> > +  (let ((commit "0e4ff0bb27edf37b76fc7d35aa768b02cf4392ad"))
> >    (package
> >      (name "tree-sitter")
> > -    (version "0.20.8")
> > +    (version "0.20.10")
> >      (source (origin
> >                (method git-fetch)
> >                (uri (git-reference
> >                      (url "https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter")
> > -                    (commit (string-append "v" version))))
> > +                    (commit commit)))
>
> If this is just a case of upstream "releasing", but not tagging the
> commit, I'd just put the commit in on this line. You don't need the (let
> ((commit ... pattern unless you're incorporating the commit in to the
> version.


Will do, thank you!




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 271 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.