GNU bug report logs -
#64783
Build of texlive-font-maps fails
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Hello,
>
> "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_bab <at> web.de> writes:
>
>> Is there a package that says "all of texlive"? When working with LaTeX,
>> I do not know beforehand which packages I need but rather always need
>> all available to try out what works well.
>
> The "all of texlive" package is called `texlive'.
>
> When you have this one in your profile, you shouldn't need any
> "texlive-" prefixed package. OTOH, if you don't have `texlive', which is
> what I suggest, you need to start off with a base system, such as
> `texlive-scheme-basic' and extend it with TeX Live collections.
I found that after an update, pdflatex is broken with texlive and
additional packages, but works when
Should all texlive-prefixed packages be removed from the manifest? If
yes: can we somehow add a warning about this?
I have this list in my manifest:
"texlive"
"texlive-ae"
"texlive-amsfonts"
"texlive-bin"
"texlive-charter"
"texlive-cm-super"
"texlive-fontinst"
"texlive-ec"
"texlive-iwona"
"texlive-latex-fonts"
"texlive-rsfs"
"texlive-inconsolata"
"texlive-mdwtools"
"texlive-ms"
"texlive-polyglossia"
"texlive-titlesec"
"texlive-lh"
"texlive-metafont"
"texlive-mflogo"
"texlive-mflogo-font"
"texlive-palatino"
"texlive-hyphen-complete"
"texlive-times"
"texlive-txfonts"
"texlive-zapfding"
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 288 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.