GNU bug report logs -
#64759
Broken faces
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
>> >> The semantics of nil could be the same as '((t nil)).
>> >
>> > And what is the semantics of '((t nil)) ? What attributes will the
>> > face have when realized?
>>
>> No attributes. This is the standard value used by empty faces.
>
> What does this mean? For example, what would be the foreground color?
> what would be the font? etc.
No foreground color, and no font.
> I'm not familiar with "empty face" notion. A face always has
> attributes when it is fully realized, otherwise Emacs will be unable
> to use it.
"Empty face" is the standard notion. Here's an example how it's used:
1. M-x make-empty-face RET foo RET
2. M-x customize-face RET foo RET
Then output is:
Hide Foo face: [sample]
State : NO CUSTOMIZATION DATA; not intended to be customized.
nil
-- Empty face --
>> >> Do you agree that currently the value '((t nil))
>> >> should be used for faces without default face attributes?
>> >
>> > Yes, I think so. If no better face to inherit from is available in
>> > each such case, that is.
>>
>> This means these faces should have by default '((t nil)):
>> semantic-decoration-on-includes, shr-h4, shr-h5, shr-h6,
>> nxml-text, nxml-delimiter, nxml-element-colon, makefile-shell
>> as before?
>
> Only if "no better face to inherit from is available" in all of those
> cases. Which I'm not sure is true. If you are sure, please tell why
> the faces I put there are not better ideas.
Because they will cause the same problem as with display-time-date-and-time,
except that other faces are used less often, so it will take time until users
will notice these problems.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 321 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.