GNU bug report logs -
#64735
29.0.92; find invocations are ~15x slower because of ignores
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On 08/09/2023 09:35, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> These questions can only be answered by dumping the values of the 2 GC
>>> thresholds and of consing_until_gc for each GC cycle. It could be
>>> that we are consing more Lisp memory, or it could be that one of the
>>> implementations provides fewer opportunities for Emacs to call
>>> maybe_gc. Or it could be some combination of the two.
>> Do you think the outputs of
>> https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/emacs-gc-stats.html could help?
> I think you'd need to expose consing_until_gc to Lisp, and then you
> can collect the data from Lisp.
I can expose it to Lisp and print all three from post-gc-hook, but the
result just looks like this:
gc-pct 0.1 gc-thr 800000 cugc 4611686018427387903
Perhaps I need to add a hook which runs at the beginning of GC? Or of
maybe_gc even?
Alternatively, (memory-use-counts) seems to retain some counters which
don't get erased during garbage collection.
>> All examples which use make-process call it with :connection-type 'pipe.
>>
>> The one that calls process-file (the "synchronous" impl) also probably
>> does, but I don't see that in the docstring.
> Yes, call-process uses pipes. So finding the optimum boils down to
> running various scenarios. It is also possible that the optimum will
> be different on different systems, btw.
Sure, but I'd like to improve the state of affairs in at least the main one.
And as for MS Windows, IIRC all find-based solution are currently slow
equally, so we're unlikely to make things worse there anyway.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 273 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.