GNU bug report logs - #64735
29.0.92; find invocations are ~15x slower because of ignores

Previous Next

Full log

Message #431 received at 64735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>
Cc: luangruo <at> yahoo.com, sbaugh <at> janestreet.com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
 64735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#64735: 29.0.92; find invocations are ~15x slower because of
 ignores
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 04:51:15 +0300

On 25/07/2023 11:22, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Dmitry Gutov<dmitry <at> gutov.dev>  writes:
> 
>> I'm attaching an extended benchmark, one that includes a "synchronous"
>> implementation as well. Please give it a spin as well.
> GNU/Linux SSD
> 
> (my-bench 10 "/usr/src/linux/" "")
> 
> (("built-in" . "Elapsed time: 7.034326s (3.598539s in 14 GCs)")
>   ("built-in no filename handler alist" . "Elapsed time: 5.907194s (3.698456s in 15 GCs)")
>   ("with-find" . "Elapsed time: 6.078056s (4.052791s in 16 GCs)")
>   ("with-find-p" . "Elapsed time: 4.496762s (2.739565s in 11 GCs)")
>   ("with-find-sync" . "Elapsed time: 3.702760s (1.715160s in 7 GCs)"))

Thanks, for the extra data point in particular. Easy to see how it 
compares to the most efficient use of 'find', right (on GNU/Linix, at 
least)?

It's also something to note that, GC-wise, numbers 1 and 2 are not the 
worst: the time must be spent somewhere else.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.