GNU bug report logs - #6457
24.0.50; Inappropriate error msg for set-variable

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:09:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: confirmed, fixed, wontfix

Found in version 24.0.50

Fixed in version 27.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 6457 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
Subject: bug#6457: 24.0.50; Inappropriate error msg for set-variable
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 08:10:45 +0200
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:28:23 -0800
> Cc: 6457 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:
> 
> >> > The error message is this:
> >> >
> >> > Value `999999999.0' does not match type integer of
> >> > scroll-conservatively.
> >
> > That is still the (inappropriate) error message.
> >
> >> I can't reproduce this bug when I set to 999999999.
> >
> > Perhaps it is platform-specific.
> >
> >> When I tried a larger value "9999999999999999999",
> >> I get the following error:
> >> 
> >>   Arithmetic overflow error: "9999999999999999999"
> >
> > Perhaps the inappropriate error message is platform-specific.
> >
> > I definitely see that message with emacs -Q.
> 
> I get:
> 
> set-variable: Value `1e+19' does not match type integer of scroll-conservatively
> 
> So I can reproduce this bug.

Yes, you can, just in a slightly different way: the user didn't enter
1e+19, either.




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 334 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.